Ole Miss, some mainly Christians, the whole gays aren't equal thing

[floo]

Well Jesus Christ can confirm it is true by his presence. Can your aunt? Well not so hilarious after all. You are just your usual uninformed opinionated self. No change there then?

My Great-Aunt was a real person whom I met in reality. Jesus died over 2000 years ago, you have NO evidence he resurrected!

[Sebastian Toe]

It cuts both ways... ST so what now?

The comment you made not useful at all...

I does and I shall be happy to use the hearsay argument in future and you will of course be in full agreement with it when used, wont you?


It was useful to me. So you are wrong in that regard.

[Sebastian Toe]

Well Jesus Christ can confirm it is true by his presence. Can your aunt? Well not so hilarious after all. You are just your usual uninformed opinionated self. No change there then?

Can you get him to confirm it to me right now please?
Can you?
Well not so clever after all are you?
You are just your usual assertedness self. No change there then?   

[Sassy]

My Great-Aunt was a real person whom I met in reality. Jesus died over 2000 years ago, you have NO evidence he resurrected!

Which given the millions of Christians today, that being nearly a third of the worlds population I think it suggests you are wrong.
Jesus was a real person and still is a real person. As you are incapable of understanding the bible you are not in a position to judge if he resurrected or not. 2,000 years later people still believe he did.

[Sassy]

I does and I shall be happy to use the hearsay argument in future and you will of course be in full agreement with it when used, wont you?


It was useful to me. So you are wrong in that regard.

It is pointless because with the believer they have faith and they know God. You don't so have no proof either way. Personal (like the believer does) or otherwise.

We know why we believer you have absolutely nothing to excuse your disbelief.

[Sebastian Toe]

Which given the millions of Christians today, that being nearly a third of the worlds population I think it suggests you are wrong.

Which given the millions of non-Christians, that being nearly two thirds of the worlds population, I think it suggests that they might be wrong!

Next.......

[Étienne d'Angleterre]

YOUR POSTS.... IS he for real?

Well you shouldn't have any problem in pointing out where I have discriminated, or advocated discriminating, against Christians then.

[Sassy]

Can you get him to confirm it to me right now please?
Can you?
Well not so clever after all are you?
You are just your usual assertedness self. No change there then? 

Oh YES  he can confirm to you right now. The thing is you have to want to have the truth confirmed by searching for him in truth and sincerity. That is what you have to do. Obey his words and you will see it confirmed.

[Shaker]

Which given the millions of Christians today, that being nearly a third of the worlds population I think it suggests you are wrong.

Argumentum ad populum/ad numerum.

Jesus was a real person and still is a real person. As you are incapable of understanding the bible you are not in a position to judge if he resurrected or not. 2,000 years later people still believe he did.

Lots of people believe lots of silly things and that's one of the sillier examples of that phenomenon. Belief remains exactly and precisely that - just a belief.

[Sassy]

Which given the millions of non-Christians, that being nearly two thirds of the worlds population, I think it suggests that they might be wrong!

Next.......

But not non religious. That is just the one religion. Atheists are less than 10% of the world population.
Which suggests the rest of us who believe in God are correct...

Next.... no forget that last remark.... I really do not want the next ignorant and  idiotic remarks from the uneducated.

[Shaker]

But not non religious. That is just the one religion. Atheists are less than 10% of the world population.
Which suggests the rest of us who believe in God are correct...

Do you know what the argumentum ad populum (or ad numerum) fallacy is and why you've just given just about the best example of it to disgrace this forum in some considerable time?

[Sebastian Toe]

It is pointless because with the believer they have faith and they know God. You don't so have no proof either way. Personal (like the believer does) or otherwise.

If someone has a perfectly strong held belief in something that contradicts your belief then they have faith in that.
You don't so have no proof either way.
Personal or otherwise.
 

We know why we believer you have absolutely nothing to excuse your disbelief.

If I don't believe what you believe, that in itself is a perfectly valid reason to 'excuse my disbelief'. 

[Sassy]

Well you shouldn't have any problem in pointing out where I have discriminated, or advocated discriminating, against Christians then.

It is a well know fact we see it all the time FROM YOU. Do you really believe the forum don't know?
Get a reality check... I don't have to show one post it is a well known fact. Like you never read your own post.
It is a fact and nothing will change it. No matter how you protest. I am not wasting time when you can just go and read your posts and see what the forum see all the time...

[Sassy]

Look Shaker and Seb if you want to make yourselves look more silly than you already do THEN carry on.
I personally, will not help you look more silly than you already do.

[Shaker]

Look Shaker and Seb if you want to make yourselves look more silly than you already do THEN carry on.
I personally, will not help you look more silly than you already do.

So you are therefore (a) obviously unaware that you've just committed one of the most egregious logical fallacies going and (b) are not interested in knowing how to identify it and avoid it in future.

Well, no surprises there, then.

[Shaker]

It is a well know fact we see it all the time FROM YOU. Do you really believe the forum don't know?
Get a reality check... I don't have to show one post it is a well known fact.

Oh yes you bloody well do - your assertion doesn't cut it.

You made the statement that Stephen discriminates against Christians. Back it up (you can't because he doesn't and never has) or retract it with an apology. Show some of that humility that your excuse for a religion enjoins you to exhibit for once.

[Sebastian Toe]

But not non religious. That is just the one religion. Atheists are less than 10% of the world population.
Which suggests the rest of us who believe in God are correct...

Next.... no forget that last remark.... I really do not want the next ignorant and  idiotic remarks from the uneducated.

Ah some goalpost moving, I was wondering when the hard of reasoning would introduce that. Well two can play at that game.

Are you saying that all of the non-Christians (apart from the atheists) believe in exactly the same God as you?

I'm quite happy to continue discussions with the educationally challenged in the, perhaps forlorn, hope that something might sink in, eventually!
And hopefully make them look less of a plonker than they already do!

 

[Sebastian Toe]

Look Shaker and Seb if you want to make yourselves look more silly than you already do THEN carry on.
I personally, will not help you look more silly than you already do.

Sassy if you want to make yourself look more silly than you already do THEN carry on.
I personally, will be happy to continue to highlight any idiocy that you might portray in the future.

 

[Étienne d'Angleterre]

It is a well know fact we see it all the time FROM YOU. Do you really believe the forum don't know?
Get a reality check... I don't have to show one post it is a well known fact. Like you never read your own post.
It is a fact and nothing will change it. No matter how you protest. I am not wasting time when you can just go and read your posts and see what the forum see all the time...

You need to withdraw the accusation and apologise or show where I have discriminated against a Christian.

I suspect you don't know what the word discriminate means. Not agreeing with someone is not the same as discriminating against them.

[Shaker]

You need to withdraw the accusation and apologise or show where I have discriminated against a Christian.

I suspect you don't know what the word discriminate means.

Given the way she writes, Sass doesn't know what most words mean.

[Sebastian Toe]

Not agreeing with someone is not the same as discriminating against them.

I suspect that is exactly the meaning that she attributes to it.
But never-mind all you have to do is keep that up and God will close down this Forum - because Sassy asked him to!
Wont be long now I suspect as all of the evidence will be in your posting history you know!
 

[Étienne d'Angleterre]

Given the way she writes, Sass doesn't know what most words mean.

She certainly doesn't understand what libel means.

[Sebastian Toe]

She certainly doesn't understand what libel means.

She should as she quotes from it regularly!

Oh wait a minute.....

[Étienne d'Angleterre]

She should as she quotes from it regularly!

Oh wait a minute.....

 

[The Accountant, OBE, KC]

Non-religious homophobia really is a puzzle, since the non-religious (unlike the religious) don't even have the pseudo-excuse of so-called sacred scripture to hide behind. I think it was trentvoyager (apologies if wrong) who said recently however that religion if it permeates society for long enough can allow its own homophobia to filter into wider society and thus rub off even on the non-religious. Sounds about right to me.

Fortunately for the good of right-thinking people everywhere, this sort of influence wanes and finally fades away as the generations thus influenced die out.

Presumably that applies to all ideas in society held by the non-religious - if they originally stemmed from religious people in the past they are the result of religion having permeated society.