Brownie,
Yes it does, and here's why:
First, the moon landings were a fantastically complicated enterprise involving tens and possibly hundreds of thousands of personnel, both in NASA and in the myriad contractors from whom they bought components specified and made for the task. In strict epistomological terms it's not impossible that every single one of them kept schtumm in the ensuing decades, but it's so vanishingly unlikely as to be not worth bothering with.
Personnel, who were concealed withing buildings and whom would not know if something filtered in to the studio.
So it isn't impossible. The Astronauts who trained for the first moon landing who were not selected all died in mysterious circumstances. One or two may have accidents but not the whole of those who trained except those who went to the moon.
When this had happened previously to the moon landing mission:-
https://aplanetruth.info/2015/03/31/24-why-did-so-many-apollo-astronots-die-mysterious-deaths-in-just-three-years-time/Who would have thought it safe to speak out? So all this exposed in 4 years business is not good enough.
Apparently those who could really have exposed it, were murdered it would appear before they could tell anyone.
Given all those deaths and the fact one astronaut said just before he death..."
But Grissom was also an outspoken critic of the program. Among his last words before he died, when there was a communications failure with the capsule just prior to the fire, were: “How are we going to get to the moon when we can’t communicate between two buildings?”
Moments later, the capsule burst into flames with the astronauts sealed inside. They were consumed by the fire with no chance to escape. His widow Betty and his son Scott both still maintain that the astronauts were killed deliberately by sabotage – and that their many questions have never been adequately answered.
Then Challenger explodes after take off with a teacher on board who won the chance to go into space.
January 1986.
It is weird how people died mysterious deaths but was a good chance to stop members of the public going up.
Second, those who cry "fake" have had their arguments systematically dismantled many times. There is no evidence that contradicts the fact of the landings (I'm using "evidence" in the real sense here, rather than in Hope's "if it confirms my biases then its evidence" sense by the way). Every bit of the "if there's no wind on the moon how come the flag stuck out?" -type stupidities that Sassy and others have attempted have been thoroughly rebutted.
WRONG: the arguments have not been dismantled. The examination of the moon rocks would have shown whether from earth now or a different planet but they disappeared suddenly. Even the Russians themselves do not really believe they made it to the moon. The experts who deny it happened are physicists and experts in their particular fields. Plus the Russian Scientist.
Within four years people were already denying the landing on the moon. It did come out.
Third, I would remind you that this is the same Sassy who assured us that only some planets have gravity so you're dealing here with someone whose grip on reality is - to put it charitably - tenuous, and entirely assertion-based.
The good news though is that it's kept Bacofoil in business for years, what with all those tinfoil hats they need to stop aliens reading their minds while they type away in their dressing gowns.
Oh, so you think that I, Sassy am somehow by 'say so' a force against the landing on the moon. Such a childish and even worrying thought from you.
My belief is based on a few things including Scientist (those with the know how) you and I do not have.
There are other reasons and you have to work them out for yourself.
If man travels for 6 weeks away from the earth what would he really be able to see from that distant?
This was a time when we could not sent images any other way than by camera.
