Wiggs
et al,First, thanks to the last few posters here - enjoyable reading from all. As for:
I think you are right that there is nothing left to believe in, but on the other hand, there are many symbols for this emptiness/fullness, or whatever you call it. I don't know whether this is atheism or not. In Zen, they say that hell isn't punishment, but just training! I like it.
Well, my atheism at least is bewilderment at the loopiness of the claims of most theists here and at the awfulness of the arguments they attempt to validate those claims. The emptiness/fullness idea is more nuanced though (Sam Harris essays similar territory) where I struggle more just to understand what it's supposed to
mean. Call me a feet of clay materialist, but I'm quite relaxed at the idea of letterbox reality - we shape the world according to our ability to perceive it whereas, if our eyes could see like scanning electron microscopes, then it would appear to be entirely different, and maybe our parochial sense of separateness would disappear. If "we" are just clumps of consciousness emerging from but inextricably bound to a universal field of matter and forces then fine and dandy by me.
Whence though the mystical stuff rather than just the recognition that's it's all more nuanced than we know or, possibly, can know? Why in other words presume the non-material?