Rose,
So you agree that London could vote to leave the UK as well, as that too would be democratic.
The majority view does not always prevail, other wise the death penalty might well be in place.
Ok
Provided we accept that Scotland cannot have independance because it is damaging to the rest of the Union no matter what majority of votes they have.
By the same rules, we cannot leave the EU because of the potential damage to us and them regardless of the majority vote.
I'd go for that! I voted remain. If I was only considering my POV.
But Scotland would have to give up the idea of independence. Because I'm applying the same rule.
See, I don't think Scotland is prepared to give up independance or the leave voters their democratically held referendum.
The problem too, is, you are disregarding a majority choice and doing what you think is best for them.
Which isn't democratic, and is a bit patronising.
I mean at the end of the day many leave voters are prepared to go through some hardship to have this country independant of the EU.
In the same way some Scots are prepared to struggle and have some hardship to have independance from the UK.
Have they both got the right to do that? If the majority voted yes. Can we judge if it's worth it to them?
Would I be patronising in thinking I had the right to stand in their way?
See I have this awful feeling I would be.
That's why if the majority vote they want something, even if you think they are wrong, sometimes you have to go with it.
Pick up the pieces if necessary.
I don't agree with Scotland becoming independant, I'm really against it.
But I'd think very long and hard about my right to block a majority vote of scots, even if it did harm the rest of the U.K. Because I think it's a bit patronising.
" oh I'm only doing it for your own good" sort of thing.
Can't help it!
On one level I can say ...go for it..... On the other it's not really fair and you are imposing your own views on a majority.
For me to do that to the "leave" voters or " Scotland" it's more dictatorship than democracy.
When should you ignore/block a majority vote for their own good ( or collective good)?
The answer to that is way too subjective.
Whatever it is, it isn't democracy
People are ignored, no doubt.
We justify it for many reasons, like they are small, their location, how long they have been fighting for recognition, how different they are.
But ignoring the whole majority vote of the U.K.?
That's more dictatorship.
I can see that Scotland thinks they are being dictated to, but the popular stance is they are part of the U.K.
Therefore the overall result is the one that matters..
What a terrible mess!