Author Topic: The plan for the U.K.' S future  (Read 3445 times)

SqueakyVoice

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2449
  • Life. Don't talk to me about life.
Re: The plan for the U.K.' S future
« Reply #25 on: June 28, 2016, 07:56:39 PM »
Apparently John Redwood has a plan.

Is it, 'Just wing it and hope no one notices'?

https://youtu.be/GzBq0n8dxFQ
"Let us think the unthinkable, let us do the undoable, let us prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all" - D Adams

Harrowby Hall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5039
Re: The plan for the U.K.' S future
« Reply #26 on: June 29, 2016, 08:31:29 AM »
Time for the Conservative Party to disband, give them their marching orders, we a fed up with a party that plays politics,

Gonners

I don't know whether anyone has explained this to you, but the Conservative Party is a ... political party. Its primary purpose is to play politics.
It is the nature of the beast.

That said I do have some sympathy for your viewpoint. You are correct (and Hope is incorrect) in stating that this referendum was a party political stunt. Its purpose was to kick the right rebellious contingent in the Conservative Party (Redwood et al) into oblivion. It was never intended to test national opinion, it was just a heavy handed, clumsy, expensive (though state funded) bully boy attack on members of his own party.
Does Magna Carta mean nothing to you? Did she die in vain?

jakswan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12485
    • Preloved Ads
Re: The plan for the U.K.' S future
« Reply #27 on: June 29, 2016, 09:04:36 AM »
Gonners

I don't know whether anyone has explained this to you, but the Conservative Party is a ... political party. Its primary purpose is to play politics.
It is the nature of the beast.

That said I do have some sympathy for your viewpoint. You are correct (and Hope is incorrect) in stating that this referendum was a party political stunt. Its purpose was to kick the right rebellious contingent in the Conservative Party (Redwood et al) into oblivion. It was never intended to test national opinion, it was just a heavy handed, clumsy, expensive (though state funded) bully boy attack on members of his own party.

The EU referendum act passed through parliament 544 to 53, Gonzo is talking nonsense.
Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd.
- Voltaire

Hope

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 25569
    • Tools With A Mission
Re: The plan for the U.K.' S future
« Reply #28 on: June 29, 2016, 05:56:22 PM »
That said I do have some sympathy for your viewpoint. You are correct (and Hope is incorrect) in stating that this referendum was a party political stunt. Its purpose was to kick the right rebellious contingent in the Conservative Party (Redwood et al) into oblivion. It was never intended to test national opinion, it was just a heavy handed, clumsy, expensive (though state funded) bully boy attack on members of his own party.
And I would say that you are incorrect as well, HH.  Both the Tory and Labour Parties have been split on Europe since day 1, with the Tories allowing that split to be worked out in public (transparent), whilst Labour has either swept it under the carpet or actively denied it (opaque).  I certainly know which type of party I'd rather have running the country, though in my personal view both are really too right wing.  I'd prefer the Greens or, at the least, the Lib Dems.
Are your, or your friends'/relatives', garages, lofts or sheds full of unused DIY gear, sewing/knitting machines or fabric and haberdashery stuff?

Lists of what is needed and a search engine to find your nearest collector (scroll to bottom for latter) are here:  http://www.twam.uk/donate-tools

Gonnagle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11106
Re: The plan for the U.K.' S future
« Reply #29 on: June 29, 2016, 06:08:13 PM »
Dear  Hope,

Aye! The Tories have been very transparent on Europe,  it has been a glorious piece of prestidigitation, all eyes on Europe whilst the NHS is underfunded, we still have food banks and poverty. Never mind unemployment look at pretty Europe. >:(

Gonnagle.
http://www.barnardos.org.uk/shop/shop-search.htm

http://www.twam.uk/donate-tools

Go on make a difference, have a rummage in your attic or garage.

Harrowby Hall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5039
Re: The plan for the U.K.' S future
« Reply #30 on: June 29, 2016, 06:10:20 PM »
My understanding, Hope, is that the promise of a referendum was made by David Cameron at some point during the coalition period. It was made at a time when he expected to have to remain in coalition following the next general election. He knew it would be unacceptable to his coalition partners and would not see daylight so put it in the Conservative manifesto. But he did not predict the elimination of the LibDems and was, to quote a certain Danish prince, hoist by his own petard.
Does Magna Carta mean nothing to you? Did she die in vain?

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64402

Hope

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 25569
    • Tools With A Mission
Re: The plan for the U.K.' S future
« Reply #32 on: June 29, 2016, 06:30:39 PM »
Absolutely correct, why? the Tory party has let them down, a failure to invest in this countries infrastructure, a failure to be seen to be proactively going after the big guns, the one's who siphon off billions from our country, instead they target the weak and defenceless.
In case you hadn't noticed, the Tories have been in sole power for about 19 years since we joined the Common Market/EU and a further 5 years in Coalition; Labour have been in power for the rest (41 - 24) - 17.  I'd suggest that that means that both major parties are fairly equally to blame for the lack of investment.  Here in Wales, we have received a tad over £4 billion from Europe in 'structural funding' since 2000.  That has been largely administered by a Labour administration, and one reason that Welsh places like Blaenau Gwent voted agin the EU is because the EU money they have received was spent less than cleverly.

Note, I'm not trying to palm off the blame that is rightly being laid at the Tory Party's feet; I'm simply trying to show that Labour are no less guilty.  In the 13 years they were in power under Blair and Brown, they robbed the pension pots of unions and big business alike, they failed to adequately protect the economy (and were helped to a degree by the Tory opposition, they failed to close tax loopholes, they failed to deal with the massive problems that the NHS had been falling into since the late 70s/early 80s, they've favoured their own cronies in the same way that the Tories have, ... . Yes, they did some good stuff - as have the Tories over the years - but they are certasinly no less blameless.

Quote
Your ordinary Labour voter has listened to the propaganda and thought, yes that's who to blame, johnny foreigner, our over stretched NHS, johnny foreigner, absolutely nothing to do with a governments failure to invest properly.
I'd suggest that the ordinary Labour voter has simply stuck to their long-time aversion to the EEC, let alone the EU.

Quote
The British people did not need a choice, it was foisted on them by right wing Tories and the yapping's of the UKIP, yes the EU needed to be reformed but that required strong leadership, can you honestly say we have strong leadership when they target the weak and leave the rich to continually siphon off the profits.
I wouild disagree.  As I've already mentioned, both on this thread and others, the UK has been deeply divided on the subject of Europe for 40-odd years.  If either Maggie and/or Tony had allowed a referendum on the EU treaties that they were responsible for, we might already have been out - but I suspect that we'd have still been in a somewhat different EU.

Quote
... but we still have foodbanks, we still have homeless, we still have poverty on our own streets, this is not an EU problem, this is a government problem who is wedded to a grotesque thing called austerity.
Which, in itself, is wedded to the massive global economic disaster of 9 years ago, which was brought about by shoddy financial controls across the world.  We could have chosen not to have bailed the banks out, but then we would probably have found ourselves in an even deeper hole.

Quote
So when I say unChristian, turning a blind eye to a problem which we have the means to fix, when I say unBritish, failing to help  our poor and needy, no matter what nationality, if they are on our streets it is our problem, that to me has always been the British way.
But do we have the means to fix the problems?  Scotland seemed to gone some way to doing so, largely because they have one of the largest per capita Central Government grants in the UK - leaving the other elements struggling even more than they might have.  Our position as 5th richest nation in the world had a huge amount to do with our being a member of the EU. 

Quote
Well maybe I can agree with that, but this whole mess is Tory mess, we did not need a referendum, and we certainly did not need a referendum so quickly, no one in the Tory party expected this, they did not plan for this, that is obvious from the reaction of the leave and remain Tories.
You could argue that no-one expected UKIP and pro-exit Tories to base their case on such blatant half-truths, no-one expected a Labour Party leader to be so hugely half-hearted in his support for Remain; no-one expected that the Leave campaign would have failed so signally to have done its homework and come up with a plan that could have been actioned within hours of the vote being announced; no-one could have expected ... we could go on ad infinitum. 

So I still say, kick the Tories out, the country has voted to leave, let others who do have the best interests of this country at heart negotiate our leaving.

Gonnagle.
[/quote]
Are your, or your friends'/relatives', garages, lofts or sheds full of unused DIY gear, sewing/knitting machines or fabric and haberdashery stuff?

Lists of what is needed and a search engine to find your nearest collector (scroll to bottom for latter) are here:  http://www.twam.uk/donate-tools

Hope

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 25569
    • Tools With A Mission
Re: The plan for the U.K.' S future
« Reply #33 on: June 29, 2016, 06:36:00 PM »
My understanding, Hope, is that the promise of a referendum was made by David Cameron at some point during the coalition period. It was made at a time when he expected to have to remain in coalition following the next general election.
IIRC (and I'm open to correction) it was made within the first couple of years of coalition.  I suspect that, in view of the massive diviusions across the country (and the 2 main parties) that have existed for decades, the Lib Dems might well have gone with the idea - if only to shut the critics of our membership up.
Are your, or your friends'/relatives', garages, lofts or sheds full of unused DIY gear, sewing/knitting machines or fabric and haberdashery stuff?

Lists of what is needed and a search engine to find your nearest collector (scroll to bottom for latter) are here:  http://www.twam.uk/donate-tools