Ah yes .....are you a contented non possessor of a world view of coherence,consistency and generalities?
Well IMHO you know what a worldview is because you don't have one.....................Am I right?
And religions and naturalism are world views.........and if I were looking for one of these represented this would be the forum as opposed to say ''Remembering fizzy sweets of the sixties.co.uk''.
Are religions worldviews? Surely that depends on both the religion and the individual. I don't see any religions posting on here, just individuals and I try to relate to what they say. As for naturalism, I presume you are here talking about the philosophical type, rather than the methodological type, based on your past posts. It also seems a reluctant poster, and an opinion that despite you saying others are, they seem to deny consistently.
As for 'contented', you jeep trying to shoehorn in a judgement thati have a view that I have chosen because of its qualities. I don't know if that makes any srnse , it's just the way I have ended up thinking. And I don't seem able to apply consistency and coherency to it.
I am also struggling as to (a) why you think that that not believing one has a worldview that is coherent and consistent means you are precluded from talking about things, and (b) whether you actually need a coherent and consistent worldview to be allowed to talk about things as might be taken as the implication?