Sparky,
I'll try and explain myself bluehillside but I'm not hopeful...You see...modern science says that all those trillions upon trilllions of megatons of electric energy containred within all those vast amounts of solar electric furnaces in the heavens came from a singularity...a big-bang...I and the Holy Bible disagree...are you with me so far?
Leaving aside your somewhat eccentric description of what "science" says, yes I'm with you so far - you have a personal opinion that contradicts the evidence and reasoning that science provides.
We say that there is/was an indestructible energy there first....a material not unlike dark matter but with much more bite. A bite so powerful that the entire mechancs of the universe can be traced back to it. Almighty God says it is very different to what you might normally expect and follows its own righteous laws...the very same laws Jesus taught us.
Who's "we"? I'm pretty sure that you're all on your own in your opinions here.
Anyways, what you've done there is to state a personal belief. What you've been
asked to do however is to explain
why you hold it. That's the problem here. Imagine if, say, I pitched up and said something like, "the science of gravity is all wrong. My studies lead me to conclude that stuff is held down by invisible pixies holding everything in place with very thin string".
In response you might say something like, "well, okaaay - why do you think that? What reasoning or evidence do you have for this remarkable claim?" only every time you did so I'd just repeat my pixie conjecture with no attempt of any kind to validate it.
That's essentially what's happening here, only it's the other way around. You make the same assertions over and over again, but never once trouble yourself with telling us
why you think any of these things to be true.
Do you see your problem now?
