Anchorman/Dicky Underpants...
Clearly, neither of you want saving then, but what I am trying to stress is that Jesus Christ has a wonderful science to back him up...and if we don't grasp that science soon then the message in Revelation will come and go and only those who have been deemed righteous enough, will be left. We are told that the event will impact upon us all, all at the same time...in the twinkling of an eye, and the science, and events occurring around the world today, are stating clearly that we are living in those 'last days.'
It is becoming obvious to me that I can't save anyone, but Jesus Christ can...it is through the refined 'word' of Almighty God which takes the electrical nature of the whole universe and redefines it as God's spiritual universe controlled by special righteous laws. You see...to attach ourselves to that righteous code we need to become the sort of person Jesus was and describes to us because we are dealing with a very sensitive and delicate energy source that can deliver repair, resurrection and everlasting life, whilst those who can't attach themselves to his righteous word will be, spiritually, snatched into the fiery lake of sulphur, as it is centrifugally hurled away from this planet, and I'm afraid to say will become the eternal resting place for all those who have defied Jesus Christ's loving word...and I wouldn't wish that on anyone...It's all in the Holy Bible.
Eh? "Niether of us wants saving...."?
FU is athiest; I respect tha though don't share is POV; I, on the other hand, NM, accepted Christ as my Lord, God, Saviour and King more than forty years ago, and have known Him in my life every moment since then.
And, yes, I have studied the Scriptures; I must say that your take on salvation has a uniqueness which is baffling.
You throw in complex words like science, electricity, dynamism, etc, which are not in Scripture; you use words such as 'righteousness', 'saved', etc, which are, in ways unknown to any theology of which I'm aware.
You fail to provide any evidence for your asssertions, citing the Bible as evidence. Any apologist worth his salt will tell you that's arrant drivel: The Bible is not evidence for the Bible!
There IS ample evidence from extra-Biblical sources from the tenth century BC onwards, NM - evidence I've never yet seen you cite. Try researching it.
You might like to study the origins and authorship of Revelation, and apocalyptic literature in general from the previous two and a half centuries of Judaism.
This does not negate Revelation as theology: I've preached on it several times, and will do so again; it does, however, mean that we should treat it in context and with caution.
You, it appears, do niether.