Sparky,
Not that you will find any satisfaction from my answer bluehillside...because it is in the Holy Bible...
No it isn’t. You’re just taking vague statements from that book and then mapping them on to phenomena that have been discovered since. You could just as well claim that the Koran claiming Mohammed flew to heaven on a winged horse actually described the invention of the jumbo jet.
If you seriously think the Bible predicted modern science then you’d need to find its references to MRI scanners or to iPods.
It is in science...
No it isn’t. Science describes and explains physical phenomena, but your yoking of “righteous” this and “dynamic” that to its findings is just an attempt to add a faux authority to your conjectures.
…and it is in the mechanics of human nature who, since the resurrection of Jesus Christ, measure in their many millions...
No, the only relevant “mechanics of human nature” here is our propensity to seek patterns and explanations for the phenomena we observe – Thor and thunder for example, which why religions took root and some persisted.
…the perfect scientific proof that his teaching is repeatable over and over again.
Whatever else it may be, it certainly is not “scientific proof” at all. What falsifiablility tests for example would you propose for this “proof”?
Now, you will quote to me yet again that many other people have followed many other teachings over the years as well to which I will reply that this is scientific proof that we all have a spiritual nature which must be satisfied…
Then you’d be wrong. Again. “Spiritual” is just a woo-woo term used to gussy up “strong feeling” as if in some unexplained way it has greater, celestial significance. What we actually have is a need for explanations, which is a different matter entirely.
…and the only one that comes near to this comfort and satisfaction…
First, lots of people have found “comfort and satisfaction” in lots of deistic beliefs other than your own.
Second, finding comfort and satisfaction in a belief – any belief – says nothing whatever to whether the object of that belief is real. Essentially you’re arguing here for the Tooth Fairy.
.. is the one that unifies all the fundamental force in nature which is the one taught by Jesus Christ,…
Only according to your child-like reasoning Sparky, only according to your child-like reasoning.
… to which you will reply, 'apples and jam' or something equally ridiculous.
No - to which I have actually replied with a series of rebuttals that you will now just ignore. The “cheese and pickle sandwiches” line was an allusion to your propensity for telling us
what you think but not
why you think it, let alone why you think anyone
else should take your fantasies seriously.