Sparky,
There is plenty of news on the approaching chaos bluehillside...
No there isn’t. There’s plenty of news that’s reported all right, and for that matter there’s plenty of news that isn’t reported too. “’Plane crash!” is headline news; “Today 40 million ‘planes landed safely” isn’t even reported. Your problem is that you take the former phenomenon as indicative of the state of the world and you just ignore the silent – but much more significant – evidence of the latter.
If you want to make claims about “approaching chaos” you need first to deal with the silent evidence issue. Once you’ve done that you need to find things that actually are
worsening rather than just happening. Global warming for example could fit the bill.
The problem with that though is that it’s all conditional –
if it continues at the current rate, then….etc. At the same time however there are huge efforts underway to address that “if” – the Paris agreement last week for example. In other words, the Armageddon scenario may be your personal prophecy on the issue but that’s all it is.
…it just has to be sought...but I'm not going to hold your hand looking for it. Some of that news started from NASA but the political position quickly changed and it was removed from public focus.
Your tinfoil hat is showing again.
The Holy Bible exists...so that cannot be an assertion…
No-one says otherwise, as do lots of other supposedly holy texts.
… and its truthful teachings…
You just jumped there from “it exists” to “its truthful teachings...” with no argument to get you there. That’s cheating – what makes you think that they
are truthful?
… have grabbed the minds of millions over many generations so that is'nt an assertion either.
No, but it is a bad argument – the
argumentum ad populum in fact. Several supposedly holy texts have “grabbed the minds of millions”. So what – do you think that truth is some kind of popularity contest?
Every scientist knows about cause and effect and as the Holy Bible creates much cause and effect it is worthy of scientific study.
That’s just gibberish. The “Holy Bible” is a book of stories and claims. It doesn’t “create” anything.
I bet i have lost you already but I haven't made a single assertion.
So far at least, that’s
all you’ve made.
You reject the Holy Bible so how can I have a meaning ful conversation with you about it..
I don’t “reject the Holy Bible” as you put it. What I actually reject is the claims you make for it, and for the good reason that you cannot support them with cogent reasoning.
Both you and ippy are simply exposing yourselves as devout followers of dawkinism so you will just have to wait for your fates...and hope you are right...but I have to tell you...you are wrong
There’s no such thing as “dawkinsism”. There is though a scientific theory called the theory of evolution that’s hugely well supported by evidence, and that depends for its force on all the methods of science that you just ignore when you wrongly claim scientific support for your religious assertions.