NM; Why do you do this kind of thing - intersperse your theories on theology with 'science' it's clear you know little or nothing of, beyond schoolboy physics? Equally, why did you assert, umpteen posts ago, that you 'knew' the Egyptians oppressed a slave population, when there is virtually no evidence for this, and, anyway, the Egyptian concept of slavery was not that of the Persian model, which seems to have been taken up by Greeks and Romans? There are posters here with degrees in physics, chemistry, biology and archaeology - and they look at your postings with bafflement. They - we - ask you to provide evidence. Evidence is the bedrock of science; and science can't properly be discussed without the evidence on which it is based. You singularly fail to do this at every turn. Why can't you simply produce honest, peer reviewed evidence? Physics is far beyond my ability; but even my discipline needs it - C14 dating, MRI imaging, etc. I don't need a degree in physics - but I do need to reference those who have. Equally, you mention genetics. Biology amazes me, and I envy those who are investigating the front line of genetics and DNA. Here, too, I need their help: geneticists and DNA experts have decoded the genetic links between a whole dynasty of royal mummies, in process revealing much about disease in the Ancient world. That's not speculation; that's solid, peer reviewed evidence we can refer to. Now, in the latter case - the DNA - there's a dispute raging over the interpretation of one particular mummy's DNA; but scientists can all agree that the DNA in question is solid, irrefutable evidence. In your posts, you give us no evidence to use as a base - nothing to anchor your theories on. You've been told that the Bible is not - cannot be - evidence for the Bible. No theologian or Christian apologist worth their salt will say otherwise. Un till you actually bring real evidence we can either read for ourselves or link to the thread, you'll continue to suffer the fact that you won't be taken seriously.
