Wrong. KCA was not demonstrated as fallacious. Arguments put by other people which was what we were talking about previous to these could therefore only be alternative arguments rather than demonstrations of fallacy.
Others were therefore making the arguments about alternatives. I wasn't even thinking of you although you went ahead and claimed that others were claiming KCA was fallacious rather than what they were doing which was putting alternatives to KCA. If the context is understood correctly then you appear as a victim of your own confirmation bias...............Try another.
Nope - the KCA is fallacious, which has been pointed often, and the only thing to do when presented by fallacious arguments is to reject them out-of-hand, since they are bad arguments, rather than counter them with an alternative argument.
That, however, isn't the issue we are discussing. You portrayed my comment as indicating that I thought there were alternative arguments to the KCA and yet I made no reference to any alternative arguments in my post (which iirc was my first in that thread) since, as noted above, fallacies need only be rejected as bad arguments and not countered.
That is what the exchange shows: on that note I think we've derailed enough on this.
