So far, following the triumphal trumpeting of the walking baby-making machine which disastrously masquerades as the prime Minister of the United Kingdom (I'm sure that from this characterisation it is clear that my comments are totally objective) about the trading agreement between the UK and Australia, no-one appears to have questioned any environmental consequences.
When last I looked, Australia and Great Britain were almost as far apart geographically as it is possible to get on planet Earth. And products travelling from one country to the other would require a journey by ship lasting a number of weeks or transportation by air which, in carbon terms, is very expensive. In addition, most food products - certainly meat - will also require constant refrigeration.
Do you think that environmental considerations formed any part of the deliberations?