Hi Susan,
for those who would like another referendum: how would you feel if you had felt sstrongly that (a)we should leave,(b) had a larger percentage of those who voted than the remainers and (c) haven't changed their minds, however unfortunate that appears to be to me?
Depends how it was done. If it was just announced, probably pretty unhappy. If the rationale was explained though, I’d have nowhere to go. Leaving aside the sandwich of 30-odd years before of the Telegraph, Sun, Express and Mail tilling the soil by lying about the EU and the inability afterwards of Parliament to find an answer, the filling is the 2016 referendum itself. It was corrupt in my view for three reasons:
1. None of the promises made by the loudest and most influential proponents were true.
2. It was illegally funded, with some £7m of campaign funds still unaccounted for.
3. The question was so vague that no matter what solution is proposed (hard exit, customs union, Norway, Canada etc etc) the proponent will claim that that’s what the 17-odd million wanted so it honours their wished. Manifestly this cannot be true.
If this stuff happened in a parish council meeting or a cricket match it’d be voided and run again. Yet somehow May and others seem determined to peddle the nonsense of “honouring the referendum” as if it was a legitimate democratic exercise.
It wasn’t and I find it hard see how anyone can “bring the country together” when the side that lost believes it was cheated.