Increasingly concerned about the lack of balance on BBC QT.
Last night there was one current Tory (Rudd) and two ex-Tories (Soubrey and Farage) - effectively 3/5 of the panel reflected the current Tory infighting between the centre right (Soubrey) and the hard right (Farage).
And the other two were a current Labour MP and an ex-Labour donor.
And just Soubrey is in favour of remain/people's vote.
Where is the balance in a world where, even on the basis of the 2016 referendum, the country split is 52:48.
The BBC is really struggling in this new world where brexit is the biggest yes/no issue and it is getting it badly wrong.
Give yourself a treat Proff, assuming you haven't already done so Go to YouTube and look for Lord Pearson's address to the HOLords about brexit
In his own words referring to the BBC:
'Since the referendum there has only been one programme examining the opportunities of Brexit on the BBC and cannot point to any other on this subject and that is just examining the possibilities not promoting them'.
A bit further on he referred to the findings of a survey by a company he used called 'Civitas' where this company found that:
'BBC interviewees since the referendum, out of 4275 guests 132 were supporters of the of the withdrawal from the EU or in fact this amounted to 3.2% of this guest list'.
I'd settle for, as compensation for their bias, seeing a re-run of the BBC's coverage of the referendum night with all of the beautifully picturesque, mortified looks on virtually all of the BBC's staff and I would enjoy seeing Jeremy Vine explaining his abandoned double yellow brick road, for old times sake.
Oh no the BBC always looks as though it has a bias whichever side you're on, pigs? Where?
ippy