E-mail address to contact Admin direct is admin@religionethics followed by .co.uk.
I was simply helping out with some background information about your source, ippy. You're so exercised about the bias you've decided infests the BBC, I was surprised you posted a link to a paper from 2014 produced by an organisation with an obvious bias. Civitas is not transparent about its sources of funding and hasn't updated its sketchy summary of where its money comes from on its website since 2016. I've got no intention of spending any time researching claims you make by proxy, since you don't engage with discussion or provide any evidence worth the name for your views. Your link reminds me of Spud quoting the Bible as support for his views.
It's just as easy to say: 'The BBC is not transparent about its sources of funding and hasn't updated its sketchy summary of where its money comes from on its website since 2016', as it is to say, 'Civitas is not transparent about its sources of funding and hasn't updated its sketchy summary of where its money comes from on its website since 2016',perhaps with the exception of BBC funding.ippy.
You do know you are contradicting yourself here?
I worked with somebody who was in Civitas, quite a gruesome mix of right wing ideas, anti-BBC, anti-NHS, pro-Brexit, and all the usual right wing stuff, e.g., capital punishment, wogs begin at Calais. I didn't imagine we would have a government like this, next step eugenics. It's not fascist yet, but how long?
Try to come away from the BBC/Guardian for a while, try the Russian English language T V news channel quiet often surprisingly to me it shows far less bias than or the BBC/Guardian. ippy.
It is certainly very worrying to know that there was an adviser at No. 10 who was not ejected immediately his eugenics views were mentioned. Adam Rutherford was interviewed yesterday on Radio 4 and, being a professional geneticist, he knows exactly what he is talking about.
English politics is moving to the right, and the hard right. You can see it in Brexit, the anti-BBC attacks, and hiring a eugenicist. Where next?
You do know you are missing something here Trent?ippy.
Try to come away from the BBC/Guardian for a while, try the Russian English language T V news channel quiet often surprisingly to me it shows far less bias than or the BBC/Guardian.
I can read the words that you wrote, but I'm buggered if I can see a connection with what I wrote about fascism.
What?Something kike you are willing to support a racist government to get your Brexit done And further you are willing to dismantle the bbc because iyo it was biased. You then provide a report from a biased organisation to prove your accusation of bias.I am not the one missing something here.
Who's the eugenicist?BTAIM, eugenics isn't necessarily an idea of the right. In the early 20th century, before the Nazis gave it as bad name, it was a popular idea with msny people on the left: Julian Huxley and G.B. Shaw, to name but two.
It's easier to say what you write above about the BBC, as it's not true. On the other hand, I had to do some research to find out about Civitas and what I wrote is true. Spot the difference.Come up with any benefits of leaving the EU yet? Oh, don't tell me, just like all that evidence for the existence of God, no point posting it...
Don't be daft. Crack down on immigrants and the poor, what more do you want?
We've left and that's good enough for me, try someone else if you feel the need to argue about it and would be difficult to persuade me the that the BBC was full of as many shining halo wearers working for BBC as it appears to me that you seem to think there are.If I were to spend from now till doomsday arguing about Brexit with any remainer I very much doubt it'd make a jot of difference, surely that was why there was a referendum, not just you and I but over the whole spectrum of leavers and remainers we, both sides, think the other side was potty and probably still do.The in out arguments I would have thought were for the pre Brexit referendum era.ippy.
I never thought that the remainers or the leavers en masse were 'potty', Ippy, to use your word, and still don't, so please don't tar everybody with the same brush.
I wasn't aware I was trying to single anyone out, I was referring to leavers or remainers in general terms which I would have thought was obviousYou've just underlined this consistent, apparent wish to keep on arguing after the event by one faction or the other, perhaps you'd prefer one of the following words or expressions: wrong, silly, daft, not quiet there, a bit over the top, is there anything there you would like to use in place of my use of the word potty, please be my guest and use any word or expression you like that means something similar in general terms, of course. Perhaps you could use something like bloody tiresome, as a substitute, be sure to please yourself enki. ippy.
