Author Topic: Buck House renovations  (Read 5068 times)

Anchorman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16038
  • Maranatha!
Re: Buck House renovations
« Reply #50 on: November 30, 2016, 01:16:59 PM »
No prob, Ippy. As a Scot, I'm sorry for foisting the Stewart rabble onto you lot when your Lizzie didn't manage to get up the duff. NS is right, though - there was never a Lizzie I of the UK, so whatever Lizzie Windsor is 'II' of, it isn't 'britain'.
"for, as long as but a hundred of us remain alive, never will we on any conditions be brought under English rule. It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself."

Sebastian Toe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7719
Re: Buck House renovations
« Reply #51 on: November 30, 2016, 07:24:37 PM »
Is there not now a convention where the 'highest ' regnal number will be taken? So the next James will be James VIII for example even though England has never had a James III through VII.
"The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends.'
Albert Einstein

Anchorman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16038
  • Maranatha!
Re: Buck House renovations
« Reply #52 on: November 30, 2016, 07:39:18 PM »
Is there not now a convention where the 'highest ' regnal number will be taken? So the next James will be James VIII for example even though England has never had a James III through VII.




That was invented by Churchill in 1952, Seb.....to try and cool the ire of certain individuals north of the border - such as 'Wendy Wood' and her bombing campaign - dubbed 'the most polite terrorist in history' - when she and fellow idiots bombed empty post boxes with "EIIR" on them.
Hence there's only "ER" up here.
Before Lizzie planted her posterior on the stone, the ' british' establishment couldn't care less about what other nations fellt - hence William III (Dutch Billy) was William II of Scots, then Edward definately not VII, etc.
"for, as long as but a hundred of us remain alive, never will we on any conditions be brought under English rule. It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself."

Sebastian Toe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7719
Re: Buck House renovations
« Reply #53 on: November 30, 2016, 07:42:06 PM »

Seems like a reasonable compromise.
"The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends.'
Albert Einstein

Anchorman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16038
  • Maranatha!
Re: Buck House renovations
« Reply #54 on: November 30, 2016, 07:47:02 PM »
Why should there be any compromise? If James Stuart was James I of 'gret britain, then Billy the Dutchman should be William I,. Edward Saxe-Coburg Edward I, and Elizabeth Mountbatten Windsor should be Elizabeth I.
"for, as long as but a hundred of us remain alive, never will we on any conditions be brought under English rule. It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself."

ippy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12679
Re: Buck House renovations
« Reply #55 on: November 30, 2016, 08:10:02 PM »
No prob, Ippy. As a Scot, I'm sorry for foisting the Stewart rabble onto you lot when your Lizzie didn't manage to get up the duff. NS is right, though - there was never a Lizzie I of the UK, so whatever Lizzie Windsor is 'II' of, it isn't 'britain'.

Love the sensitivity in your turn of phrase;  I love Phill the Greek and Betty really.

ippy


Hope

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 25569
    • Tools With A Mission
Re: Buck House renovations
« Reply #56 on: November 30, 2016, 09:48:43 PM »
Why should there be any compromise? If James Stuart was James I of 'gret britain, then Billy the Dutchman should be William I,. Edward Saxe-Coburg Edward I, and Elizabeth Mountbatten Windsor should be Elizabeth I.
Actually, James (6th of that name as far as Scotland is concerned) was the first of that name for England, as you well know, Jim.  'Gret Britain' didn't come into the picture until 170-odd years later.
Are your, or your friends'/relatives', garages, lofts or sheds full of unused DIY gear, sewing/knitting machines or fabric and haberdashery stuff?

Lists of what is needed and a search engine to find your nearest collector (scroll to bottom for latter) are here:  http://www.twam.uk/donate-tools

Anchorman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16038
  • Maranatha!
Re: Buck House renovations
« Reply #57 on: November 30, 2016, 10:16:44 PM »
'Jamie the saxt' made it well known that he wished to be known as King of Great Britain, Hope.
"for, as long as but a hundred of us remain alive, never will we on any conditions be brought under English rule. It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself."

Anchorman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16038
  • Maranatha!
Re: Buck House renovations
« Reply #58 on: November 30, 2016, 10:20:40 PM »
Here's a link from Britannic to illustrate James Stuart's style of titles. https://www.britannica.com/biography/James-I-king-of-England-and-Scotland
"for, as long as but a hundred of us remain alive, never will we on any conditions be brought under English rule. It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself."

Sebastian Toe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7719
Re: Buck House renovations
« Reply #59 on: November 30, 2016, 10:27:57 PM »
Why should there be any compromise? If James Stuart was James I of 'gret britain, then Billy the Dutchman should be William I,. Edward Saxe-Coburg Edward I, and Elizabeth Mountbatten Windsor should be Elizabeth I.
Let's compromise and agree to disagree!
"The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends.'
Albert Einstein

Anchorman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16038
  • Maranatha!
Re: Buck House renovations
« Reply #60 on: November 30, 2016, 10:36:11 PM »
Agreed - where the royal wasters are concerned, anything goes! English history is daft.....it ignores King Louis, for starters 'cos he was politically inconvenient - whilst styling Longshanks Edward I - when the bloomin place had already had THREE Edwards before him! )Scotland, of course, similarly tried to gloss over the fact that we, too, had an Edward - Balliol - a puppet foisted on us by the auld enemy who was about twice as useless as Toom Tabard!
"for, as long as but a hundred of us remain alive, never will we on any conditions be brought under English rule. It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself."

Sassy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11080
Re: Buck House renovations
« Reply #61 on: December 09, 2016, 11:52:56 PM »
God put her there, Sass? Did the God - who is without error - have an off day when he planted Edward (not the) VII on the throne....the same llethario who had had more mistresses than I've had hot dinners....and invited them for a front row seat when the bishop put the bling on his bonce in the Abbey? The same king who was head of a church yet maintained a mistress till the day he snuffed it (That mistress being Camilla Parker wotsit's great great granny, by the way)? The God who is without error who put a coward like George V on the throne, who in an un-Christ like act refused the Soviet governments offer to have his own cousin, his wife and children as refugees, thus condemning them to death? And don't even start me on Edward VIII Either these were men put on an unelected position by men, or God had an off day. There is nothing of God in an unelected powerless rubber stamp of an anachronistic throwback.

So who is  worse Satan or any man in history?
You see how senseless and how far away from God and who he is, your thoughts are?
What about Saul and David.... do yourself a favour. Having shot yourself in the foot best to close your mouth before you put your foot in it.

My God knows the end from the beginning. Do you think he chose and made them do what they did? Why do all things work together for good with those who love God?

Who made you judge of men you have never even known or met?

Who made you judge of God?  Be quiet till you know whom you are talking about.
We know we have to work together to abolish war and terrorism to create a compassionate  world in which Justice and peace prevail. Love ;D   Einstein
 "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."

Sassy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11080
Re: Buck House renovations
« Reply #62 on: December 09, 2016, 11:54:31 PM »
#24 Thanks for the cut-and- paste synopsis of the bilge that passes for a constitution in this disunited kingdom, Sass. As God gives me strength, I'll continue to treat it with the disrespect it deserves.

Jealousy is never good. But i SEE you have let yourself look stupid and even insulted the God who made us. How much can you get wrong in one thread?
We know we have to work together to abolish war and terrorism to create a compassionate  world in which Justice and peace prevail. Love ;D   Einstein
 "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."

Sassy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11080
Re: Buck House renovations
« Reply #63 on: December 09, 2016, 11:55:12 PM »
;D ;D

Ah, a mighty fine thing to see Jim flow

Fools seldom differ comes to mind...
We know we have to work together to abolish war and terrorism to create a compassionate  world in which Justice and peace prevail. Love ;D   Einstein
 "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."

Sassy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11080
Re: Buck House renovations
« Reply #64 on: December 09, 2016, 11:56:31 PM »
Sotrry, I won't comment on individuals (Though, having met Chairlie a few times, I might.....) I reserve the right to pour scorn, ridicule and disdain on the unearned, unelected roles they claim, though.

You have not earned your right to represent God or Faith in Christ.
So I would watch out, God just might let everyone else know this too.
We know we have to work together to abolish war and terrorism to create a compassionate  world in which Justice and peace prevail. Love ;D   Einstein
 "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."

Anchorman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16038
  • Maranatha!
Re: Buck House renovations
« Reply #65 on: December 10, 2016, 10:28:28 AM »
Jealousy is never good. But i SEE you have let yourself look stupid and even insulted the God who made us. How much can you get wrong in one thread?




Hmmmmm.....
I'll stick with the Covenanters, thanks.
Their slogan "We have no king, save Christ!" works for me.
It seemed to govern my ancestor, James Brown of Priesthill, as well.
He believed in a church and state free from royal interferance.
He was shot in front of his wife and children for adhering to Christ, rather than crown.
Google "the Christian Carrier"....it might help a tad.
"for, as long as but a hundred of us remain alive, never will we on any conditions be brought under English rule. It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself."

ekim

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5812
Re: Buck House renovations
« Reply #66 on: December 10, 2016, 12:17:14 PM »
.... or render to Caesar that which is Caesar's and render to God that which is God's.