Not convinced about 'b', this smacks of a false premise.
I can only assume that you're unfamiliar with the concept of goodness, therefore. My definition of the word certainly includes the desire - but not, alas, the ability which presumably you think that your god, if it existed, would have - to prevent suffering; not just to make it all better after the event, but to forestall it
before it occurs. The attributes ascribed to the traditional omnimax god, in actual fact, allow for such a god to create a universe in which there is no suffering of any kind because a god of all-goodness would wish it, a god of all-knowledge would allow it to know how to do so and a god of all-power would allow that universe to be created, by definition of those concepts. No amount of tedious waffle from the likes of Hope about dynamic worlds can answer this objection.
Unless of course you don't believe in a god who is either all-knowing, all-powerful or supremely good? Hope always runs away from that particular question (as with a great many more, come to that) but you're welcome to have a bash, if you like.
The God I know, wants that all should be saved, that all should come to the knowledge of the truth, and repent.
Wibble.