The idea of a ban on elephant products - particularly ivory - is an attempt to stop the hunting of these magnificent animals. Clearly something must be done. But I wonder if, for instance, the wholesale destruction of ivory and ivory products is not going to be counter productive.
If the amount of ivory in circulation is reduced, is that not likely to create a black market in which the price of ivory increases, making its possession even more attractive (to those who find it attractive) than it is now? Instead of burning ivory stocks, would it not be more effective to flood the market - thus making it (relatively) commonplace?
The people who then acquire could be mocked as vulgar and tasteless ... rather like Donald Trump.