The quick guide to Dodgy fallacies.

[Walt Zingmatilder]

Step 1: Has the ''fallacy'' been outlined by an antitheist
Step 2: Google the ''fallacy''. If the first entries direct you to sites like RationalWiki you know were on dodgy ground.

[Sebastian Toe]

Step 1: Has the ''fallacy'' been outlined by an antitheist
Step 2: Google the ''fallacy''. If the first entries direct you to sites like RationalWiki you know were on dodgy ground.

How do you determine if the author in question is an "antitheist" before you get to step 1?

[Walt Zingmatilder]

How do you determine if the author in question is an "antitheist" before you get to step 1?

On this forum? Are you kidding me.

[Sebastian Toe]

On this forum? Are you kidding me.

This forum. Another forum. Any forum.
Or was that just another of your vlassertions?

[Outrider]

Step 1: Has the ''fallacy'' been outlined by an antitheist

Argumentum ad hominem - that's a fallacy, to be clear. Either it's a fallacy or it's not, who has cited it is irrelevant.

Step 2: Google the ''fallacy''. If the first entries direct you to sites like RationalWiki you know were on dodgy ground.

Guilt by association - that's a fallacy, to be clear. Where you find the explanation of the fallacy doesn't matter, unless the formulation is incorrect.

O.

[Owlswing]

Step 1: Has the ''fallacy'' been outlined by an antitheist
Step 2: Google the ''fallacy''. If the first entries direct you to sites like RationalWiki you know were on dodgy ground.

Was it posted by Vlad - if "Yes" it is almost 100% certain to be a logical fallacy (in his case should be spelled phallacy) of one kind or another.

[jeremyp]

Argumentum ad hominem - that's a fallacy, to be clear. Either it's a fallacy or it's not, who has cited it is irrelevant.

Guilt by association - that's a fallacy, to be clear. Where you find the explanation of the fallacy doesn't matter, unless the formulation is incorrect.

O.

I was going to ask if you are an antitheist, but Rationalwiki didn't come up when I Googled those fallacies, so it doesn't matter.

[Jack Knave]

How do you determine if the author in question is an "antitheist" before you get to step 1?

Vlad has 'special' sensors for this...

[Walt Zingmatilder]

Vlad has 'special' sensors for this...

A specially adapted colander and a couple of duracells should do it.

[Jack Knave]

A specially adapted colander and a couple of duracells should do it.

Vlaaaad! Don't give your secret away or we will all want one.

[Outrider]

A specially adapted colander and a couple of duracells should do it.

Are you allowed to don the religious paraphernalia of a better different religion?

http://tinyurl.com/qhhnkrn (Daily Telegraph)

O.

[Walter]

Are you allowed to don the religious paraphernalia of a better different religion?

http://tinyurl.com/qhhnkrn (Daily Telegraph)

O.

Luvit!

[Walt Zingmatilder]

Are you allowed to don the religious paraphernalia of a better different religion?

http://tinyurl.com/qhhnkrn (Daily Telegraph)

O.

Who'd have thought it......a colander wearing an atheist.

[Owlswing]

Who'd have thought it......a colander wearing an atheist.

Final proof of the blindness of some Christians who cannot see the difference between an atheist wearing a colander and a colander wearing an atheist.

[Outrider]

Who'd have thought it......a colander wearing an atheist.

My pastafarian friends will no doubt be disappointed to know that you're discriminating against them - they've worked hard to achieve 'anti-theist' status, you know...

O.

[Harrowby Hall]

My pastafarian friends will no doubt be disappointed to know that you're discriminating against them - they've worked hard to achieve 'anti-theist' status, you know...

O.

.. and for them a colander is a sacred vessel.

[Sebastian Toe]

.. and for them a colander is a sacred vessel.

And a very holey one at that!

[Walt Zingmatilder]

.. and for them a colander is a sacred vessel.

Sorry your argument is so full of holes you could strain pasta through it.