Author Topic: Russian court considers JW ban.  (Read 2462 times)

Anchorman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16038
  • Maranatha!
Russian court considers JW ban.
« on: March 18, 2017, 10:06:07 AM »
 I may not agree with them - I don't - but I'm uneasy at the thought of them being banned. OK, JW's wear out doorknockers and dent the market for black puddings, but this is way over the top. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-39304984
"for, as long as but a hundred of us remain alive, never will we on any conditions be brought under English rule. It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself."

floo

  • Guest
Re: Russian court considers JW ban.
« Reply #1 on: March 18, 2017, 11:11:09 AM »
I can't say that worries me too much as I detest that ghastly cult. I am much more concerned about Russia's attitude to gays.

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64366
Re: Russian court considers JW ban.
« Reply #2 on: March 18, 2017, 11:15:15 AM »
I can't say that worries me too much as I detest that ghastly cult. I am much more concerned about Russia's attitude to gays.
The point about freedom is it is as important, if not more, to defend the freedom of those you disagree with as much as possible, not just those you agree with. Your attitude provide support to oppression and indirectly validates the Russian govts' attack on homosexuality.

Anchorman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16038
  • Maranatha!
Re: Russian court considers JW ban.
« Reply #3 on: March 18, 2017, 11:38:25 AM »
I can't say that worries me too much as I detest that ghastly cult. I am much more concerned about Russia's attitude to gays.

-
So you'd be perfectly happy with Russia imprisoning those who disageree with them, then?
Really?
I'm no fan of the Russelites - but, seriously, floo, are you really happy that Russia might imprison them?
"for, as long as but a hundred of us remain alive, never will we on any conditions be brought under English rule. It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself."

floo

  • Guest
Re: Russian court considers JW ban.
« Reply #4 on: March 18, 2017, 11:46:49 AM »
-
So you'd be perfectly happy with Russia imprisoning those who disageree with them, then?
Really?
I'm no fan of the Russelites - but, seriously, floo, are you really happy that Russia might imprison them?

Considering how much physical harm and death that cult can cause by forbidding blood transfusions, I think prison might be a good idea if it causes a death, although a bit extreme I suppose just for believing in the JW garbage. Maybe the UK should think of imprisoning JWs if they cause the death of a minor, or a vulnerable person, by refusing a blood transfusion.

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64366
Re: Russian court considers JW ban.
« Reply #5 on: March 18, 2017, 11:50:35 AM »
Considering how much physical harm and death that cult can cause by forbidding blood transfusions, I think prison might be a good idea if it causes a death, although a bit extreme I suppose just for believing in the JW garbage. Maybe the UK should think of imprisoning JWs if they cause the death of a minor, or a vulnerable person, by refusing a blood transfusion.
In the UK blood will be given, based on case law.

Walter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4463
Re: Russian court considers JW ban.
« Reply #6 on: March 18, 2017, 11:55:21 AM »
The point about freedom is it is as important, if not more, to defend the freedom of those you disagree with as much as possible, not just those you agree with. Your attitude provide support to oppression and indirectly validates the Russian govts' attack on homosexuality.
bollox , and I'm not even going to qualify that.

back to normal , I knew it couldn't last! x

Anchorman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16038
  • Maranatha!
Re: Russian court considers JW ban.
« Reply #7 on: March 18, 2017, 11:59:36 AM »
Considering how much physical harm and death that cult can cause by forbidding blood transfusions, I think prison might be a good idea if it causes a death, although a bit extreme I suppose just for believing in the JW garbage. Maybe the UK should think of imprisoning JWs if they cause the death of a minor, or a vulnerable person, by refusing a blood transfusion.
- Dunno what the 'UK' position is, but in Scotland a ruling from the local procuratior fiscal will ensure that any child is treated - legal stuff can then follow. But seriously; you'd be happy imprisoning someone for their belief just because you don't agree with it? What if some was imprisoned for atheism - as certain religion dominated cultures of several varietes have tried in the past?
"for, as long as but a hundred of us remain alive, never will we on any conditions be brought under English rule. It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself."

Walter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4463
Re: Russian court considers JW ban.
« Reply #8 on: March 18, 2017, 12:03:08 PM »
- Dunno what the 'UK' position is, but in Scotland a ruling from the local procuratior fiscal will ensure that any child is treated - legal stuff can then follow. But seriously; you'd be happy imprisoning someone for their belief just because you don't agree with it? What if some was imprisoned for atheism - as certain religion dominated cultures of several varietes have tried in the past?
but were not talking about atheism (whatever that is?) ARE WE.

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64366
Re: Russian court considers JW ban.
« Reply #9 on: March 18, 2017, 12:04:06 PM »
bollox , and I'm not even going to qualify that.

back to normal , I knew it couldn't last! x

What is qualified bollox? A bawbag with a degree?

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64366
Re: Russian court considers JW ban.
« Reply #10 on: March 18, 2017, 12:05:15 PM »
but were not talking about atheism (whatever that is?) ARE WE.
It's a matter of principle, I believe some people have them.

Walter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4463
Re: Russian court considers JW ban.
« Reply #11 on: March 18, 2017, 12:30:10 PM »
It's a matter of principle, I believe some people have them.
I'm shooting from the hip/lip today, collateral damage is inevitable!

floo

  • Guest
Re: Russian court considers JW ban.
« Reply #12 on: March 18, 2017, 01:56:36 PM »
In the UK blood will be given, based on case law.

True, but by the time the court has ruled over the issue the damage could have been done. :o For anyone who doesn't know why I have such a jaundiced opinion of JWs, in 1986, when our darling adopted Down's Syndrome son was 16 months old, he needed a blood transfusion to save his life. A day or so later a couple over JWs knocked on our door and I challenged them about their stance on blood transfusion. They told me our lad would have been better off dead than receiving blood from another person! >:(

Anchorman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16038
  • Maranatha!
Re: Russian court considers JW ban.
« Reply #13 on: March 18, 2017, 02:43:31 PM »
What has that got to do with imprisoning a sect in Russia, please, floo?
"for, as long as but a hundred of us remain alive, never will we on any conditions be brought under English rule. It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself."

Robbie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7512
Re: Russian court considers JW ban.
« Reply #14 on: March 18, 2017, 03:40:44 PM »
True, but by the time the court has ruled over the issue the damage could have been done. :o For anyone who doesn't know why I have such a jaundiced opinion of JWs, in 1986, when our darling adopted Down's Syndrome son was 16 months old, he needed a blood transfusion to save his life. A day or so later a couple over JWs knocked on our door and I challenged them about their stance on blood transfusion. They told me our lad would have been better off dead than receiving blood from another person! >:(

The JWs do not believe that someone is damned, if they are given blood without consent, as in case of child or unconscious.

Going back to anchorman's op, suppressing any type of movements makes martyrs. Whats the pointof that. I don't likethe JW religion but am glad we live in a free country and have choices regarding religious belief. The Witnesses were persecuted in Russia and under Hitler.

I read somewhere that Islam is growing in russia but a lot of it is cover. Young Russian women seek rich husbands in America, some of whom come from Muslim backgrounds, go figure.
True Wit is Nature to Advantage drest,
          What oft was Thought, but ne’er so well Exprest

Bubbles

  • Guest
Re: Russian court considers JW ban.
« Reply #15 on: March 18, 2017, 03:51:19 PM »
For goodness sake!

 I have relatives who are JW's, no way do I support Russia's stance on it.
Yes they are totally pacifist and believe in simplistic things, but I wouldn't ban them.

Russia isn't a tolerant place for difference, any difference.

I'm glad my relatives don't live there, because no one deserves that.

After all the main objection seems to be they won't vote or support politics and won't fight in a war.

If they don't want to, they shouldn't have to. It's all about control, control of the average person.

The Russian authorities can't dictate to them, what they think they should think.

It's all about power.

Either people conform or end up down some salt mine, horrible!

I prefer the JWs to the Russian authorities.

 >:(






Robbie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7512
Re: Russian court considers JW ban.
« Reply #16 on: March 18, 2017, 03:53:37 PM »
Excellent!
True Wit is Nature to Advantage drest,
          What oft was Thought, but ne’er so well Exprest

Harrowby Hall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5038
Re: Russian court considers JW ban.
« Reply #17 on: March 18, 2017, 11:33:23 PM »
My understanding, which may not be accurate, is that hospitals have established ways of making vulnerable children wards of court and so can readily act in a child's best interest. I agree that whatever a sect's failings may be, persecuting that sect is a despicable act.

With reference to the treatment meted out to JWs by the third reich ...

Russell may have been the instigator of the JWs but the sect we know today was really the creation of J F Rutherford - one of the nastiest people ever to walk this planet. It is ironic that he was a great admirer of Adolf Hitler and acquired an apartment in Germany so that he could witness Hitler's oratory at first hand. The compliment was not returned ...
Does Magna Carta mean nothing to you? Did she die in vain?

Anchorman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16038
  • Maranatha!
Re: Russian court considers JW ban.
« Reply #18 on: March 19, 2017, 09:32:20 AM »
Don't get me started on the pyramidiocy and counter pyramidiocy which seemed to be the foundation of the sect, or the corruption, misapropriation of assets which peppered Rutherford's dictatorship....Beth Sarim and Elijah's cadillac come to mind....or the cavalier rewrite of the Bible to make it say something it certainly didn't say - and the vile treatment of the 'disfellowshipped' in the group. That being said, persecution of a group which doesn't conform to a state's idea of a faith or non faith position is against the United Nations Charter. (Mind you, the JW's believe that the U.N. is an instrument of Sat an anyway....)
"for, as long as but a hundred of us remain alive, never will we on any conditions be brought under English rule. It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself."

SweetPea

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2669
  • John 8:32
Re: Russian court considers JW ban.
« Reply #19 on: March 19, 2017, 10:29:35 AM »
Jim

I'm not a fan of the JWs, either but I also think it's a sign of the times.... which has always been and continues on today:

Matthew 10:22 You will be hated by everyone because of My name. But the one who endures to the end will be delivered.
For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power and of love and of a sound mind ~ 2 Timothy 1:7

Bubbles

  • Guest
Re: Russian court considers JW ban.
« Reply #20 on: March 19, 2017, 10:40:45 AM »
My understanding, which may not be accurate, is that hospitals have established ways of making vulnerable children wards of court and so can readily act in a child's best interest. I agree that whatever a sect's failings may be, persecuting that sect is a despicable act.

With reference to the treatment meted out to JWs by the third reich ...

Russell may have been the instigator of the JWs but the sect we know today was really the creation of J F Rutherford - one of the nastiest people ever to walk this planet. It is ironic that he was a great admirer of Adolf Hitler and acquired an apartment in Germany so that he could witness Hitler's oratory at first hand. The compliment was not returned ...

No the JW's were shoved in the gas ovens alongside the Jews.
The holocaust was also theirs.


Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64366
Re: Russian court considers JW ban.
« Reply #21 on: March 19, 2017, 10:42:56 AM »
No the JW's were shoved in the gas ovens alongside the Jews.
The holocaust was :'( also theirs.
Harrowby Hall didn't say they weren't, so I don't understand your use of 'No' above

Bubbles

  • Guest
Re: Russian court considers JW ban.
« Reply #22 on: March 19, 2017, 10:45:53 AM »
Harrowby Hall didn't say they weren't, so I don't understand your use of 'No' above

🙄

I was agreeing with the last part of his post.

As in No, the Nazis ( or Hitler)didn't return the complement.

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64366
Re: Russian court considers JW ban.
« Reply #23 on: March 19, 2017, 10:47:55 AM »
🙄

I was agreeing with the last part of his post.

As in No, the Nazis ( or Hitler)didn't return the complement.
. Ah thank you for the clarification

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32521
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Russian court considers JW ban.
« Reply #24 on: March 19, 2017, 10:51:05 AM »
I can't say that worries me too much as I detest that ghastly cult. I am much more concerned about Russia's attitude to gays.
It's all part and parcel of the same problem.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply