Author Topic: 'Free' abortion  (Read 1038 times)

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63917
'Free' abortion
« on: June 14, 2017, 10:54:20 AM »
I think this is the legally correct decision.



http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-40271763

Rhiannon

  • Guest
Re: 'Free' abortion
« Reply #1 on: June 14, 2017, 04:05:12 PM »
I agree, technically it is. Morally, however...

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63917
Re: 'Free' abortion
« Reply #2 on: June 14, 2017, 04:10:37 PM »
I agree, technically it is. Morally, however...
Indeed, but that isn't the choice. I have to hope that the Tories plan to screw the GFA might have some blowback on issues like this.

Humph Warden Bennett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5013
Re: 'Free' abortion
« Reply #3 on: June 15, 2017, 03:03:09 PM »
I agree, technically it is. Morally, however...

I think it morally wrong to kill the unborn.

floo

  • Guest
Re: 'Free' abortion
« Reply #4 on: June 15, 2017, 03:16:43 PM »
I think it morally wrong to kill the unborn.

I have no problem with abortion as long as it is done well before the foetus is viable.

Robbie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7512
Re: 'Free' abortion
« Reply #5 on: June 15, 2017, 03:32:44 PM »
Same here.
Nothing to stop a NI resident coming here and saying they live here, if they have friend whose address theycan borrow. No-one is going to check.

On the other hand many can afford to pay.

I agree with NS that it is the right decision, legally.

True Wit is Nature to Advantage drest,
          What oft was Thought, but ne’er so well Exprest

floo

  • Guest
Re: 'Free' abortion
« Reply #6 on: June 15, 2017, 03:40:04 PM »
Obviously is better to practise safe sex and avoid an unwanted pregnancy. But of course even if you do, occasionally things can go wrong if the condom fails, for instance.

Rhiannon

  • Guest
Re: 'Free' abortion
« Reply #7 on: June 15, 2017, 04:27:28 PM »
One case that I read of was of a woman whose child was diagnosed with a condition that meant she'd die soon after birth. In England she could have had a termination and be left to grieve and recover. In NI she had to wait another fifteen weeks before labour started naturally and during that time she had to deal with all the usual comments that expectant mothers get - aren't you blooming, is it a boy or a girl etc. Eventually she did give birth and the child died shortly after. I do wonder how much more suffering is caused by letting the foetus grow larger in such circumstances.

That doesn't protect the unborn child. It just tortures the mother.

floo

  • Guest
Re: 'Free' abortion
« Reply #8 on: June 15, 2017, 04:28:59 PM »
One case that I read of was of a woman whose child was diagnosed with a condition that meant she'd die soon after birth. In England she could have had a termination and be left to grieve and recover. In NI she had to wait another fifteen weeks before labour started naturally and during that time she had to deal with all the usual comments that expectant mothers get - aren't you blooming, is it a boy or a girl etc. Eventually she did give birth and the child died shortly after. I do wonder how much more suffering is caused by letting the foetus grow larger in such circumstances.

That doesn't protect the unborn child. It just tortures the mother.

I agree.