I think we need to be clear here that racism is allowed and will continue to be so. The issue in the case is actually incitement to violence. I used the twitter joke case as it is comparable for that. Now I think here there is a question about it being incitement to violence against an individual and that could be seen as note 'real' rather than just a joke. I struggle though with the idea that such comments are liable for prosecution. Should we have stopped Shakespeare writing 'First, let's kill all the lawyers'? How about the drunks in the shite table in the shite pub? It's the very fact that I find the comments heinous and disgusting that makes me think they should be allowed. Je suis Charlie
I find the difference to be that in the first instance it was a case of one person stating an intention to commit a "terrorist" act if certain circumstances continued.
The Visc*nt, sorry, Viscount, offered money if someone else to procure the commission violence, murder even, on his behalf - the racism thus, I would think, becomes a minor part of the sentencing criteria.
In fact I would wonder what would have happened if the 'murder contract' target had been white, or male, or pro-Brexit, or LGBT.