It is striking how some prejudices refuse to die. I don't quite understand it. In my recent meanderings on t'internet looking at the marking of the 50th anniversary of the passing of the 67 Sexual Offences Act I was struck afresh at how many bigoted people are still out there.
As the saying has it 'Haters gonna hate'.
We can only hope that as time passes so will these prejudices, but it is a grindingly slow process. Ho-hum.
I don't know but suspect that at best mistrust and at worst fear of difference, of the other, is an inherent part of the human animal. To that extent it doesn't seem feasible that it can ever be eradicated.
On the other hand, I've been following the umpteen programmes across several channels marking the 50th anniversary of the Sexual Offences Act and one of several notable things that struck me is that for people of my age and younger sexuality simply isn't an issue, to the extent that there are some people in the public eye who are gay but not regarded as such - not because it's hidden as used to be the case but because there's no longer a perceived need to mention the fact. It's not a consideration, no longer a marker of identity that needs to have attention drawn to it.
If I lived in London I would, I hope, be aware that my opinion might well be formed by a very small and wholly unrepresentative sample of a metropolitan population and not applicable outside of that milieu; but I don't - very far from it; I live in rural Leicestershire.
I think it was back in the 1970s that an American gay rights activist said (of the gay rights movement, obviously) that time and the younger generation were on their side. I think that that's true of any and every movement that enlarges the sphere of human freedom. This isn't like Marx's idea of inevitable historical progress; it's not naive enough to think that there can't be reversals and setbacks of the kind we're seeing in the US right now. Nevertheless, I think there's more than enough evidence to substantiate the man's claim.