In the past the Hollywood films quite obviously glamorised smoking, as a part of promoting the product, we also hear about product placement within the film making industry and various manufacturers pay largish sums to gain as much exposure of their products as possible, I doubt they would be paying for these things if they didn't sell the goods placed.
When I look at all of the various films around today where the actors are striking their, mostly macho, poses with guns and it's not just the odd film here and there, even films like 'Star Wars' where the ray guns are a substitute, I suppose I could be accused of imagining things if I was to think there were some N R A funding the glamorising of guns and the use thereof within the U S film industry?
I don't say glamorising guns is the major part of the Americans problem with guns but I'm sure it's a part of their problem that shouldn't be ignored.
ippy