Surely everyone can only read what they think you post i.e. what they think you mean? I didn't find your post particularly clear but in context of a discussion on pay if someone says there have been areas where things haven't improved and you appear to doubt that by challenging them, it's a legitimate reading to think you are saying that the specific are you reference is one where your doubt applies.
I posted what I thought was an interesting discussion which covered the gender pay gap. I have a daughter, a wife, a sister, a mother all have faced or will potentially face discrimination simply because they are women.
It is better than it was but we still have a long way to go, I do suspect that false claims of discrimination do much to undermine any progress. I do not think HH was discriminating and posted in context.
I replied to this post because it offered a segue into what I wanted to say.
