Author Topic: 'A Woman of Limited Intelligence'  (Read 1099 times)

Keith Maitland

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 489
'A Woman of Limited Intelligence'
« on: November 06, 2017, 01:19:15 AM »
A few weeks ago Peter Morgan, a staunch Republican, called the Queen a “countryside woman of limited intelligence", during his conversation with the Sunday Times's Culture Magazine, and claimed that Elizabeth II "would have much preferred looking after her dogs and breeding horses to being Queen."

These are harsh words from someone who built his career by chronicling the monarch's reign—and whose sensitive portrait of a woman committed to duty and country has inspired a new generation of people to love the Queen.

Is Mr. Morgan aware of the paradox?

Shaker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15639
Re: 'A Woman of Limited Intelligence'
« Reply #1 on: November 06, 2017, 01:34:10 AM »
The comment about preferring to walk the dogs and breed horses rather than be the queen is one I've heard before.

Mr Morgan wrote both The Queen and The Crown, regards royal biographers as "scurrilous" and "insolent" and was awarded the CBE - are you sure he's a "staunch republican"? An Independent article says that he's "described as a staunch republican" but unfortunately omits to say described by who, when and where, which is fairly standard journalistic practice for tagging an opinion onto someone without having to do anything as infra dig. as justifying it with any evidence.
« Last Edit: November 06, 2017, 01:44:59 AM by Shaker »
Pain, or damage, don't end the world. Or despair, or fucking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man, and give some back. - Al Swearengen, Deadwood.

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32502
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: 'A Woman of Limited Intelligence'
« Reply #2 on: November 06, 2017, 03:17:59 AM »
since we have a constitutional monarchy, it doesn't matter how intelligent the monarch is. Fortunate really, when you consider the next one.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64335
Re: 'A Woman of Limited Intelligence'
« Reply #3 on: November 06, 2017, 07:26:37 AM »
Preferring looking after dogs and horses as opposed to being Queen seems eminently sensible and I say that as a 'staunch republican'

Walter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4463
Re: 'A Woman of Limited Intelligence'
« Reply #4 on: November 06, 2017, 07:37:00 AM »
since we have a constitutional monarchy, it doesn't matter how intelligent the monarch is. Fortunate really, when you consider the next one.
imagine yourself as king and all it entails , do you think you would proud and enjoy it ?

Rhiannon

  • Guest
Re: 'A Woman of Limited Intelligence'
« Reply #5 on: November 06, 2017, 08:03:24 AM »
I’ve never considered the Queen to be thick but it’s not hard to see she’s not fantastically bright either. Just rather...ordinary.

Robbie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7512
Re: 'A Woman of Limited Intelligence'
« Reply #6 on: November 06, 2017, 06:50:11 PM »
Yes, like many people who maybe left school after O levels but ended up doing very well. It was a rather stupid and unkind thing to say because people will interpret "limited intelligence" to mean 'thick', when everyone's intelligence is limited. The Queen has certainly taken pains in her life to learn about different things and presents herself well.  Breeding horses and dogs successfully is quite a talent too.
True Wit is Nature to Advantage drest,
          What oft was Thought, but ne’er so well Exprest