A few weeks ago Peter Morgan, a staunch Republican, called the Queen a “countryside woman of limited intelligence", during his conversation with the Sunday Times's Culture Magazine, and claimed that Elizabeth II "would have much preferred looking after her dogs and breeding horses to being Queen."
These are harsh words from someone who built his career by chronicling the monarch's reign—and whose sensitive portrait of a woman committed to duty and country has inspired a new generation of people to love the Queen.
Is Mr. Morgan aware of the paradox?