Author Topic: Should we remember them?  (Read 3282 times)

Anchorman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16038
  • Maranatha!
Should we remember them?
« on: November 12, 2017, 12:06:46 AM »
      Today, we remember those in the forces who died in war - and society should never be allowed to foget them.
But there's a part of the war story which is neglected - the conshie.
Many were arrested and imprisoned for refusing to fight - or demonstrating against the wars in the first place, and because of the conviction they held.
Some were shot on the front line as cowards for refusing to kill.
Here's a thoughtful artical from a Scots newspaper - and, yes, I know it's old news, but it might start of a siscussion;

http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/13172243.Let_s_commemorate_the_WW1_objectors/
"for, as long as but a hundred of us remain alive, never will we on any conditions be brought under English rule. It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself."

Owlswing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6945
Re: Should we remember them?
« Reply #1 on: November 12, 2017, 12:25:46 AM »
      Today, we remember those in the forces who died in war - and society should never be allowed to foget them.
But there's a part of the war story which is neglected - the conshie.
Many were arrested and imprisoned for refusing to fight - or demonstrating against the wars in the first place, and because of the conviction they held.
Some were shot on the front line as cowards for refusing to kill.
Here's a thoughtful artical from a Scots newspaper - and, yes, I know it's old news, but it might start of a siscussion;

http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/13172243.Let_s_commemorate_the_WW1_objectors/

They could, of course, join the RAMC and many did! They did as their conscience required they worked to save lives rather than taking them.

Unforunately, just as with shell-shock, the attitude was criminally sadistic.

I think it was Kitchener who never refused to sign a death warrant on a charge of cowardice (for cowardice read shellshock!)

Just think, if this had been the case in WWII there would never have been a Goon Show!
The Holy Bible, probably the most diabolical work of fiction ever to be visited upon mankind.

An it harm none, do what you will; an it harm some, do what you must!

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32502
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Should we remember them?
« Reply #2 on: November 12, 2017, 02:15:52 AM »

I think it was Kitchener who never refused to sign a death warrant on a charge of cowardice (for cowardice read shellshock!)
You think all the soldiers who were found guilty of cowardice had shell shock?
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Anchorman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16038
  • Maranatha!
Re: Should we remember them?
« Reply #3 on: November 12, 2017, 09:12:36 AM »
Interesting to note that many of those shot in France were guilty of 'derertion'....but no soldier who deserted in dear old Blighty at the same time - and there were many - was shot for it.
"for, as long as but a hundred of us remain alive, never will we on any conditions be brought under English rule. It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself."

Anchorman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16038
  • Maranatha!
Re: Should we remember them?
« Reply #4 on: November 12, 2017, 09:38:01 AM »
       Growing up in the '60's and '70's, I remember a local barber, Bert McCulloch, and was always puzzled why some passed him in the street and refused to talk to him.
I found out, later, that he had been a conshie - because he was a Plymouth Brethren.
He was sent down the mines to work - and the mining community ostracised him as well. Apparently, his fellow workers would urinate on his lunch - or replace it with faeces. He was forced to take his lunch underground in a locked cash box.
Things only improved when he saved three trapped miners from a seam which was unstable, at the risk to his own life.
However, for decades after the war, Bert was referred to, in conversation, as 'the conshie'.
It took a certain amount of guts to stand by one's convictions in the face
"for, as long as but a hundred of us remain alive, never will we on any conditions be brought under English rule. It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself."

Walter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4463
Re: Should we remember them?
« Reply #5 on: November 12, 2017, 09:46:20 AM »
      Today, we remember those in the forces who died in war - and society should never be allowed to foget them.
But there's a part of the war story which is neglected - the conshie.
Many were arrested and imprisoned for refusing to fight - or demonstrating against the wars in the first place, and because of the conviction they held.
Some were shot on the front line as cowards for refusing to kill.
Here's a thoughtful artical from a Scots newspaper - and, yes, I know it's old news, but it might start of a siscussion;

http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/13172243.Let_s_commemorate_the_WW1_objectors/
yes , thoughtful and disgusting

Rhiannon

  • Guest
Re: Should we remember them?
« Reply #6 on: November 12, 2017, 09:56:52 AM »
This makes me think of something I saw in my local town during the Iraq war, a middle aged woman with a candle and a home made cardboard sign saying ‘Peace Vigil’ being screamed at by a squaddie in uniform.

Walter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4463
Re: Should we remember them?
« Reply #7 on: November 12, 2017, 10:05:39 AM »
This makes me think of something I saw in my local town during the Iraq war, a middle aged woman with a candle and a home made cardboard sign saying ‘Peace Vigil’ being screamed at by a squaddie in uniform.
you cant have vigil without a candle; it's the law !

Owlswing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6945
Re: Should we remember them?
« Reply #8 on: November 12, 2017, 11:13:12 AM »

You think all the soldiers who were found guilty of cowardice had shell shock?


The vast majority were such victims. There have been several documentaries on the matter and when a soldier ran from the trenches on the front-line shell-shock was the usual culprit.

You, Jeremy, would, I have no doubt, have been of such a strong character that you would be able to watch your mates being blown to bits day after day with no more than a sardonic 'Oh bad luck Charlie/Gearge/Fred' etc!
The Holy Bible, probably the most diabolical work of fiction ever to be visited upon mankind.

An it harm none, do what you will; an it harm some, do what you must!

Owlswing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6945
Re: Should we remember them?
« Reply #9 on: November 12, 2017, 11:15:20 AM »

you cant have vigil without a candle; it's the law !


Sarcie b*****d aren't you!
The Holy Bible, probably the most diabolical work of fiction ever to be visited upon mankind.

An it harm none, do what you will; an it harm some, do what you must!

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32502
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Should we remember them?
« Reply #10 on: November 12, 2017, 11:35:07 AM »
Interesting to note that many of those shot in France were guilty of 'derertion'....but no soldier who deserted in dear old Blighty at the same time - and there were many - was shot for it.
A couple of hundred were actually shot.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32502
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Should we remember them?
« Reply #11 on: November 12, 2017, 11:40:37 AM »
The vast majority were such victims. There have been several documentaries on the matter and when a soldier ran from the trenches on the front-line shell-shock was the usual culprit.
How do you know?

Quote
You, Jeremy, would, I have no doubt, have been of such a strong character that you would be able to watch your mates being blown to bits day after day with no more than a sardonic 'Oh bad luck Charlie/Gearge/Fred' etc!
It's a constant source of amazement to me that anybody stayed at the front. I presume I would not have deserted, but only because most people didn't.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Owlswing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6945
Re: Should we remember them?
« Reply #12 on: November 12, 2017, 12:26:09 PM »
How do you know?
It's a constant source of amazement to me that anybody stayed at the front. I presume I would not have deserted, but only because most people didn't.

This does not make your comments any more palatable.
The Holy Bible, probably the most diabolical work of fiction ever to be visited upon mankind.

An it harm none, do what you will; an it harm some, do what you must!

Walter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4463
Re: Should we remember them?
« Reply #13 on: November 12, 2017, 02:57:35 PM »
Sarcie b*****d aren't you!
thank you for noticing , I try my best!

Robbie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7512
Re: Should we remember them?
« Reply #14 on: November 12, 2017, 03:10:58 PM »
It's a constant source of amazement to me that anybody stayed at the front. I presume I would not have deserted, but only because most people didn't.

I'd have found somewhere to hide and crept out after the gunfire stopped and rejoined the troops.
True Wit is Nature to Advantage drest,
          What oft was Thought, but ne’er so well Exprest

ippy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12679
Re: Should we remember them?
« Reply #15 on: November 12, 2017, 03:26:04 PM »
                                                               Should we remember them?

I think we should and there's a need to show lots of respect to the nearest and dearest of the dead that we haven't forgotten the sacrifice their loved ones have made, well the dead of course they're gone and wont now anything about it.

ippy

Owlswing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6945
Re: Should we remember them?
« Reply #16 on: November 12, 2017, 04:14:33 PM »

I'd have found somewhere to hide and crept out after the gunfire stopped and rejoined the troops.


Quote
from: jeremyp on Today at 11:40:37

    It's a constant source of amazement to me that anybody stayed at the front. I presume I would not have deserted, but only because most people didn't.


Which both show just how much stress it must have taken to drive those who did to run!
The Holy Bible, probably the most diabolical work of fiction ever to be visited upon mankind.

An it harm none, do what you will; an it harm some, do what you must!

Shaker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15639
Re: Should we remember them?
« Reply #17 on: November 12, 2017, 04:56:50 PM »
It's a constant source of amazement to me that anybody stayed at the front. I presume I would not have deserted, but only because most people didn't.
There I think it would have been a case of safety in numbers.

Deserters were well aware that if caught they would most likely be shot. Some were, of course. You can shoot one; you can shoot ten; you can shoot twenty; possibly even fifty. Once you get to five hundred or a thousand men - more - shooting them becomes a far trickier prospect, especially given that the men we're talking about were by definition armed.

Any revolt relies on taking a large number of others along with you to succeed.
Pain, or damage, don't end the world. Or despair, or fucking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man, and give some back. - Al Swearengen, Deadwood.

Walter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4463
Re: Should we remember them?
« Reply #18 on: November 13, 2017, 01:44:36 PM »
There I think it would have been a case of safety in numbers.

Deserters were well aware that if caught they would most likely be shot. Some were, of course. You can shoot one; you can shoot ten; you can shoot twenty; possibly even fifty. Once you get to five hundred or a thousand men - more - shooting them becomes a far trickier prospect, especially given that the men we're talking about were by definition armed.

Any revolt relies on taking a large number of others along with you to succeed.
look at the horror,, I have no words !



https://youtu.be/fHuNQER_8rI

Owlswing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6945
Re: Should we remember them?
« Reply #19 on: November 13, 2017, 04:01:00 PM »

Look at the horror,, I have no words !

https://youtu.be/fHuNQER_8rI


And that is a santised version for the viewing public!

Imagine if even this version were in full colour!
 
The Holy Bible, probably the most diabolical work of fiction ever to be visited upon mankind.

An it harm none, do what you will; an it harm some, do what you must!

Walter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4463
Re: Should we remember them?
« Reply #20 on: November 13, 2017, 04:53:10 PM »
And that is a santised version for the viewing public!

Imagine if even this version were in full colour!
too much as it is !!!

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64339
Re: Should we remember them?
« Reply #21 on: November 13, 2017, 05:11:43 PM »
Yes, we should.

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64339
Re: Should we remember them?
« Reply #22 on: November 13, 2017, 05:13:22 PM »
A couple of hundred were actually shot.
I read Anchorman as meaning that people were shot by the British for deserting in France but not deserting in the UK. That seems to be correct, as far as I can find on a quick trawl.

Walter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4463
Re: Should we remember them?
« Reply #23 on: November 13, 2017, 05:23:13 PM »
I read Anchorman as meaning that people were shot by the British for deserting in France but not deserting in the UK. That seems to be correct, as far as I can find on a quick trawl.
I seem to remember a BBC programme that dealt with  this subject but for the life of me can't remember the title,
I think it was part dramatized with one of them McGann brothers in it .

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64339
Re: Should we remember them?
« Reply #24 on: November 13, 2017, 05:26:20 PM »
I seem to remember a BBC programme that dealt with  this subject but for the life of me can't remember the title,
I think it was part dramatized with one of them McGann brothers in it .
The Monocled Mutineer