E-mail address to contact Admin direct is admin@religionethics followed by .co.uk.
You didn't warn us it was by Melanie McDonagh. You are a bad man.
Isn't she the woman, I was going to say lady but thought better of it, upon whom Rita Skeeter was based?
The go ahead far thinking Spectator thoughts on a bloke called Harry and a women called Meghan getting engaged. I am presuming the idea was write some click/comment bait. https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2017/11/prince-harry-and-meghan-markle-the-union-of-royalty-and-showbiz/
What an unpleasant article!
... though very far from wrong in every particular.
Seriously? You think that simply because Markle is divorced she's unsuitable to marry a royal?
No - that was horseshit in 1936, never mind now. I meant that the whole thing is a fusion of royalty and showbiz. It's an X Factor-style royal engagement.
That’s the headline. It’s not the article content.
What the engagement will do is consolidate the real nature of the modern royal family, which is part of the entertainment and showbiz side of the nation.
This looks like it is:
No, the focus as a snobbish lifestyle judgement on someone for being both divorced and liberal.
Yes I know - I don't expect otherwise from the Speckled Tater. The point is the content isn't belied by the headline (or vice versa).
I switched on the lunchtime news to the seemingly endless tide of sycophancy. I'm afraid each time such an announcement is made it reinforces my republicanism. I may have to just ignore the news until next summer - which given the state of the world may be no bad thing in itself.
Markle will make history as the first mixed race member of the British Royal family, which is a huge PLUS, imo.
There is one other thing which doesn't seem to have surfaced yet ... did I hear that this young woman is - not only divorces, of mixed race, politically liberal - but also Catholic?
Now allowed and not of interest to Melanie McDonagh
