But then you have to go further and say the evidence is but parts of a pattern which gives rise with a bit of perceptual and logical filling in to an unavoidable whole.
You need a modicum of scientific awareness to "observe" the ToE. After all it took one of the most highly trained, committed and experience scientists of the day to actually get it.
I suppose creationists tend to dismiss 'scientific awareness', so that they can make odd claims, e.g. there is no evidence for evolution, or it is all based on 'assumptions'. It reminds me of the study of the sun, which we can now identify as a star, although maybe originally for some people, it was a deity or even a planet. We can't actually go there and examine bits of it, but astronomy advanced sufficiently, so that stars could be described, and their development, and within that field of study it became apparent that the sun is an average yellow dwarf, or perhaps a bit more white than that! But it would very odd to say that we cannot do this, as we can't directly examine the sun, or we weren't there when it began to be formed. Of course, we can examine its light and so on.
