Don't you want to prove the doubters wrong Private Fraser and give a clear, cogent explanation of your position?
1. The secular religious divide in the House of Lords is recognised in its official title which includes the Lords temporal or secular Lords and the Lords spiritual.
2. The current division is 96.7% secular lords to3.3% Bishops.
3. The notion of religion being somehow privileged above the secular here does not stack up
4. In terms of schools Humanist UK and NSS have right to found schools
5. Many schools are church foundations
6. The church has therefore no privilege in the right to found schools.
7. Objective teaching of religion already exists in schools
8. Any further religious obligation is on all schools and is not necessarily interpreted by the religious.
9. The NSS is unreliable in its descriptions concerning religious broadcasting which is minimal and unreflective of the number of religious licence payers or the BBC mission to inform and entertain.
10. The wider secular world considers NSS and humanist U.K. Unreasonable in some respects concerning the presence of religion in society and takes no action or action to equalise by providing rights to secularists rather than indulging the secularists tendency to demand elimination. Vis allowing them to found state schools or free schools.
