E-mail address to contact Admin direct is admin@religionethics followed by .co.uk.
Do we know with absolute certainty that May is racist and lying, or is it an assumption?
She's lying that the cards issue has any effect because they only become important after the 2014 legislation, and for not admitting that it's her legislation that caused the issue. She's racist for introducing the legislation. Absolute certainty is a nonsensical concept. And absolute certainty vs an assumption is a false dichotomy
I wonder if it was the SNP leader who was in frame for this if you would be roundly condemning her, or looking for an excuse for her conduct, just a thought?
Yes, why wouldn't I? And what difference would that make to whether May is fit to be PM?
I rest my case!
May is using the anti-Semitism affair in labour as a get out of jail free card on the Windrush affair, and admitted as much in statements in parliament.
Fully agree with this, it was a disgusting piece of whataboutery and distraction.
The BBC have a report that the decision to generally dispense with paper records was taken in 2009. It seems to me that that could just be a general notice to shift to electronic records.The actual decision to specifically destroy landing records was apparently taken in October 2010.report herehttp://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-43806710
And May was warned and went ahead - lying racist and incompetent but supported by LR. http://anotherangryvoice.blogspot.co.uk/2018/04/who-were-18-mps-who-bravely-voted.html
Oh for heaven's sake NS, I am NOT supporting May if she is in the wrong on this issue, I didn't even vote for her party!
You think she should remain PM, that's supporting her. BYW any chance of explaining what you think your case was that you rested?
Where did I say that? Stop making things up?
Surely when you said 'People are screaming for May to resign, but I can't think of anyone else in her party who is up to the job', you are implying that she should stay, rather than agreeing she should resign? And again any chance of you explaining the case you rested?
You made an assumption, which was incorrect. I was wondering who would take over if May is forced out of office and wasn't fancying any of the alternatives, as I didn't think they would be any better. I don't rate May, I think David Cameron was a much better PM.
So you agree she should resign? And again any chance of you explaining the case that you rested?
The only important people in this debate are the Windrush generation, and whilst she is still in office May had better ensure the wrongs of the past are put right.
Any chance at all of an answer to either the question of whether she should resign or the 'case' that you 'rested'?