Author Topic: May vetoed more visas for doctors  (Read 1539 times)


Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33235
Re: May vetoed more visas for doctors
« Reply #1 on: May 01, 2018, 01:57:51 PM »
This seems very stupid


https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/theresa-may-refused-to-budge-on-quotas-for-foreign-medics-after-cabinet-ministers-pleas-for-more-a3828141.html
So we have all been affected by the ''Hostile environment'' this f*ckt*rd has set up. And yet they are ahead in the polls.
Expect many tory voters starting to live on fresh air and imagining they can fly.

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64369
Re: May vetoed more visas for doctors
« Reply #2 on: May 01, 2018, 02:11:55 PM »
So we have all been affected by the ''Hostile environment'' this f*ckt*rd has set up. And yet they are ahead in the polls.
Expect many tory voters starting to live on fresh air and imagining they can fly.

And the economy is not at its best


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-43919094


For Labour not be ahead is shocking

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33235
Re: May vetoed more visas for doctors
« Reply #3 on: May 01, 2018, 02:19:20 PM »
And the economy is not at its best


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-43919094


For Labour not be ahead is shocking
I think it's more the GBP. It looks as though May, banking on there being bloody minded antiimmigration abroad and it was more important to people than the NHS and playing it and that it bolsters support was right in thinking that. 

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64369
Re: May vetoed more visas for doctors
« Reply #4 on: May 01, 2018, 02:27:43 PM »
I think it's more the GBP. It looks as though May, banking on there being bloody minded antiimmigration abroad and it was more important to people than the NHS and playing it and that it bolsters support was right in thinking that.
Nope, she's benefitting from the Labour party being so dysfunctional that it makes the Tories look the less worse.
« Last Edit: May 01, 2018, 02:36:01 PM by Nearly Sane »

Rhiannon

  • Guest
Re: May vetoed more visas for doctors
« Reply #5 on: May 01, 2018, 03:56:50 PM »
I don’t think you can get away from the fact that many traditional Labour areas are also anti immigration. And many to the centre right aren’t.

wigginhall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17730
Re: May vetoed more visas for doctors
« Reply #6 on: May 01, 2018, 04:06:55 PM »
Yes, I thought polls are showing heavy support for the 'hostile environment', though not for the Windrush people.  There is still support for Brexit, isn't there?  May is utilizing these elements, I suppose. 
They were the footprints of a gigantic hound!

wigginhall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17730
Re: May vetoed more visas for doctors
« Reply #7 on: May 01, 2018, 04:31:29 PM »
You could say that the right wing are dominant in England in relation to immigration and Brexit, outside London.  For example, this seems true in Norfolk.  I don't know how Labour can deal with this.   I suppose they could replace Corbyn, but maybe then they would lose other people, (like me).
They were the footprints of a gigantic hound!

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64369
Re: May vetoed more visas for doctors
« Reply #8 on: May 01, 2018, 04:53:06 PM »
You could say that the right wing are dominant in England in relation to immigration and Brexit, outside London.  For example, this seems true in Norfolk.  I don't know how Labour can deal with this.   I suppose they could replace Corbyn, but maybe then they would lose other people, (like me).
Not sure the right wing is dominant in England. It's not that long ago Labour had a majority there too and we are told that the younger people are not anti immigration as much as older people. We have a situation where in England, it is very polarised. Other parties are almost irrelevant but Labour is struggling to get above 40%. The Tories by don't of being able to get 44% and our crap voting system are therefore doing ok.


If Corbyn  went who else would you vote for?

wigginhall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17730
Re: May vetoed more visas for doctors
« Reply #9 on: May 01, 2018, 04:56:02 PM »
Green.
They were the footprints of a gigantic hound!

Rhiannon

  • Guest
Re: May vetoed more visas for doctors
« Reply #10 on: May 01, 2018, 04:58:07 PM »
Green.

Just what I was about to say. In fact they are the only party I’ll even consider voting for, Corbyn or no Corbyn. I used to be active in the party years ago and I think it’s time I rejoined.

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64369
Re: May vetoed more visas for doctors
« Reply #11 on: May 01, 2018, 05:07:23 PM »

wigginhall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17730
Re: May vetoed more visas for doctors
« Reply #12 on: May 01, 2018, 05:09:24 PM »
Why vote for a right wing Labour party, led by Yvette Cooper, or the like?
They were the footprints of a gigantic hound!

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64369
Re: May vetoed more visas for doctors
« Reply #13 on: May 01, 2018, 05:10:43 PM »
Just what I was about to say. In fact they are the only party I’ll even consider voting for, Corbyn or no Corbyn. I used to be active in the party years ago and I think it’s time I rejoined.
Leaving aside the issue with FPTP, I have a number of friends who are members of the Green Party who find it insufficiently focussed on green policies currently. I struggle with its tinge of antiscience

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64369
Re: May vetoed more visas for doctors
« Reply #14 on: May 01, 2018, 05:14:13 PM »
Why vote for a right wing Labour party, led by Yvette Cooper, or the like?
Because it's the least worse option that wins? Don't get me wrong, I have no interest in voting Labour. FPTP  has made me a tactical voter for most of my life but I wouldn't vote Labour just now, as I have no idea what I was voting fo, but if it was a seat that was either Tory or Labour, I might have to.

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33235
Re: May vetoed more visas for doctors
« Reply #15 on: May 01, 2018, 05:58:57 PM »
Nope, she's benefitting from the Labour party being so dysfunctional that it makes the Tories look the less worse.
But the tories are at least as dysfunctional so tory popularity cannot be down to dysfunction.

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33235
Re: May vetoed more visas for doctors
« Reply #16 on: May 01, 2018, 06:02:42 PM »
Why vote for a right wing Labour party, led by Yvette Cooper, or the like?
Yes that wing has been particularly unsuccessful because they accepted the Conservative narrative of Cameron and Osborne.

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64369
Re: May vetoed more visas for doctors
« Reply #17 on: May 01, 2018, 06:12:02 PM »
But the tories are at least as dysfunctional so tory popularity cannot be down to dysfunction.
Nope, they aren't, as already covered.  And false dichotomy.

Rhiannon

  • Guest
Re: May vetoed more visas for doctors
« Reply #18 on: May 01, 2018, 07:11:25 PM »
Leaving aside the issue with FPTP, I have a number of friends who are members of the Green Party who find it insufficiently focussed on green policies currently. I struggle with its tinge of antiscience

When I joined the Greens it had no interest in aligning itself with left or right and offered something different to mainstream politics. Caroline Lucas declared it to be a party of the Left and it took on its current identity. But as I feel that I currently have no voice maybe the Greens come closest to speaking for me.

I’ve always voted with my ‘beliefs’ and not tactically, but given that my dog would win this seat if you pinned a blue rosette on him I guess that is a luxury I can afford.

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64369
Re: May vetoed more visas for doctors
« Reply #19 on: May 01, 2018, 07:20:20 PM »
When I joined the Greens it had no interest in aligning itself with left or right and offered something different to mainstream politics. Caroline Lucas declared it to be a party of the Left and it took on its current identity. But as I feel that I currently have no voice maybe the Greens come closest to speaking for me.

I’ve always voted with my ‘beliefs’ and not tactically, but given that my dog would win this seat if you pinned a blue rosette on him I guess that is a luxury I can afford.

I vote for your dog.

Arguably the Greens are closest to me. But it's a seat only going to be won bby SNP or Labour, and the MP is good. Labour indulged in a piece of hereditary politics.