Author Topic: Michael Twat Recant?  (Read 1154 times)

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33225
Michael Twat Recant?
« on: May 06, 2018, 10:01:22 AM »
Michael Fabricant MP in twitter storm over bad language.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-stoke-staffordshire-44017414

Rhiannon

  • Guest
Re: Michael Twat Recant?
« Reply #1 on: May 06, 2018, 10:04:33 AM »
My daughter and I were discussing this last night. Twattishness aside, the overuse of Instagram filters by the young woman in question is rather alarming.

Ftr we decided that he’d get away with ‘twat’ but not ‘cunt’, but don’t see the point in either being the ‘worst word ever’.

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33225
Re: Michael Twat Recant?
« Reply #2 on: May 06, 2018, 10:09:48 AM »
My daughter and I were discussing this last night. Twattishness aside, the overuse of Instagram filters by the young woman in question is rather alarming.

Ftr we decided that he’d get away with ‘twat’ but not ‘cunt’, but don’t see the point in either being the ‘worst word ever’.
I wonder whether one can call a Tory MP a twat or a cunt in public and not find onesself staring down the end of a police sub machine gun or have one's passport taken away?

Robbie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7512
Re: Michael Twat Recant?
« Reply #3 on: May 06, 2018, 11:38:18 AM »
I'd completely forgotten 'twat' was sometimes used to describe womens' genitals, not heard that for years & I bet loads of people wouldn't have known it.

Michael Fabricant is quite right that there is another, more well known, definition:-

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=twat&rlz=1C5CHFA_enGB717GB727&oq=twat&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l5.3348j1j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

He shouldn't really be calling anyone names but it does all sound a bit of a mountain made out of a molehill. The perils of social media.
True Wit is Nature to Advantage drest,
          What oft was Thought, but ne’er so well Exprest

floo

  • Guest
Re: Michael Twat Recant?
« Reply #4 on: May 06, 2018, 12:26:50 PM »
Fabricant is obviously a very unpleasant person. >:(

SteveH

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10411
  • God? She's black.
Re: Michael Twat Recant?
« Reply #5 on: May 06, 2018, 01:14:21 PM »
Fabricant is an utter idiot. I discovered that "twat" was very rude when I was nine or ten, whenI used it of a friend I'd temporarily fallen out with, in my Dad's hearing. He made it very clear that it was not, as I'd thought until then, just another form of "twit", but was extremely rude (though he didn't tell me what it meant). I can't believe that even an idiot like Fabricant didn't know that.
I once tried using "chicken" as a password, but was told it must contain a capital so I tried "chickenkiev"
On another occasion, I tried "beefstew", but was told it wasn't stroganoff.

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33225
Re: Michael Twat Recant?
« Reply #6 on: May 06, 2018, 06:04:48 PM »
My daughter and I were discussing this last night. Twattishness aside, the overuse of Instagram filters by the young woman in question is rather alarming.

Being socially and internet inept I have no idea of the significance of this apparent failing.

Harrowby Hall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5038
Re: Michael Twat Recant?
« Reply #7 on: May 06, 2018, 08:22:13 PM »
I agree with Steve H. Fabricant (surely, a fabricated name) must have been living a somewhat isolated life if he did not know this particular case of common usage.

But then, looking at his hair, he probably does live an isolated life.
Does Magna Carta mean nothing to you? Did she die in vain?

SweetPea

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2669
  • John 8:32
Re: Michael Twat Recant?
« Reply #8 on: May 06, 2018, 09:57:41 PM »
That is one of the strangest links I've seen. The young lady complaining looks as though she's wearing a mask, and the MP in question looks as though he's wearing a wig.
For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power and of love and of a sound mind ~ 2 Timothy 1:7

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33225
Re: Michael Twat Recant?
« Reply #9 on: May 06, 2018, 10:02:37 PM »
That is one of the strangest links I've seen. The young lady complaining looks as though she's wearing a mask, and the MP in question looks as though he's wearing a wig.
That makes it sound like Michael Fabricant is in no position to call other people Twats.

TWAT Tory Wearing Alternative Trichology.

SweetPea

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2669
  • John 8:32
Re: Michael Twat Recant?
« Reply #10 on: May 06, 2018, 10:15:01 PM »

Exactly, Vlad. ;)
For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power and of love and of a sound mind ~ 2 Timothy 1:7

Rhiannon

  • Guest
Re: Michael Twat Recant?
« Reply #11 on: May 06, 2018, 10:24:45 PM »
That is one of the strangest links I've seen. The young lady complaining looks as though she's wearing a mask, and the MP in question looks as though he's wearing a wig.

Mask = instagram/snapchat filter.

Harrowby Hall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5038
Re: Michael Twat Recant?
« Reply #12 on: May 06, 2018, 10:50:34 PM »
She was on the BBC Midland News this evening. She struck me as wearing too much make up. Her whole face was a single shade of near white offset by very red lipstick. Is this called "emo"?
Does Magna Carta mean nothing to you? Did she die in vain?

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32509
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Michael Twat Recant?
« Reply #13 on: May 07, 2018, 02:27:28 PM »
Twitter storm, nothing to see here. Move along.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply