I know I have mentioned this before but to preserve societies sense of gravity about taking life, Public executioners had to face the process of a trial after each execution. Because of witness and law, acquittal or maybe it was pardon was always straight forward.
Should Assisted dying as it is so called be introduced I see no reason not to maintain this tradition as a reminder of the serious with which we should treat life and death.
Those who disagree are IMHO shaking hands with reducing the value of life and their pleas of kindness and compassion hollow particularly those deathlusters who will claim it would cost too much.
You have every right to have and hold that position about assisted dying and there should never be any requirement for you to take part in assisted death in any way, in other words if you don't like it, don't do it and just leave the rest of us alone.
Now for those that want a form of an assisted death legislation brought in we should have it as of right, like anything else set by humans I dare say we'll never find the perfect solution, nor, I doubt is the legislation they have for assisted death in Oregon the USA perfect, but I've yet to hear or read anything significantly wrong with the system they've introduced over there, other than the objections made by those that would be against any form of assisted dying, whatever or wherever.
Regards ippy