I have to admit that I am somewhat conflicted by the consequences of Mr Johnson's latest characterisation of "islamic dress".
In the first place, anything which restricts the progress of this fatuous, self-important, bloated nonentity on its self-appointed journey to 10 Downing Street has my approval, but I am disappointed to observe that it appears to be some form of political correctness that is currently being used.
My view is that everyone has the right to hold any religious belief they wish and that right is absolute. But it is also my view that believers do not have the right to impose their beliefs on anyone else. There is little that is "islamic" about the grossly enveloping and de-humanising garments that are forced upon adult (and sometimes child) female adherents of islam. They are most likely remnants of earlier tribal times where women were considered to be possessions with values equivalent to those of well-kept camels. That women should choose to wear such garments is one thing - but there remains the possibility that they either have no choice in the matter or have been brainwashed in a patriarchal environment into doing so.
The idea that religious practices and beliefs may not be questioned is inimical in a civilised, secular society. It is up to believers to justify their beliefs not to expect society to protect them. Boris Johnson has expressed a valid opinion in an open society on the behaviour of some citizens. He should not be penalised for this. I note that Baroness Warsi does not go around dressed in a bell tent.
