E-mail address to contact Admin direct is admin@religionethics followed by .co.uk.
Dangerous lunacy https://twitter.com/blablafishcakes/status/1660285985580625926https://twitter.com/blablafishcakes/status/1660287018570506240
That tweet led me to this story from somebody who was allegedly banned from Twitter because of it.https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1659984666198261764.htmlI think it tells us everything we need to know about the selfishness of somebody who wants to use a baby to validate their own identity.
And it would appear that the document linked to in the second tweet has been taken down.
Do you not think it is a little bit ironic? The idea is to affirm that trans women are women, but every time something like this happens, it makes it more obvious that they are men.
Sensible from British Cyclinghttps://www.theguardian.com/sport/2023/may/26/british-cycling-bars-transgender-women-from-competing-female-category
And the reply from Emily Bridges, one of the men affected by the decision.
Deep lying from Cycling Weeklyhttps://www.cyclingweekly.com/news/british-cycling-blocks-transgender-riders-from-competing-in-womens-races
Where's the lying?
The fact that Bridges no longer has any bollocks does not automatically give "her" the right to write bollocks.
Right out of the gate the first sentence is a lie. She can compete in the new open category.
Hehttps://fairplayforwomen.com/pronouns/
She says her name is Emily and she prefers to be referred to as "she". Whatever else you might think, about her, insisting on saying "he" is somewhat petty.Edit: Actually no, you can say "he", I don't mind, but insisting that other people say "he" is somewhat petty.
