Author Topic: Trans rights: a perspective  (Read 122420 times)

The Accountant, OBE, KC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8952
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1850 on: June 02, 2023, 01:10:48 PM »
Well, they can fuck right off. I don't believe in their religion.

Note, I will generally refer to anyone by whatever name they choose, though there are issues with sex offenders using it as a loophole, but I don't 'misgender' people because I don't believe in reifying regressive patriarchal stereotypes.


https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/oxford-college-toexpel-students-misgender-trans-peers/
Some interesting scenarios here in the comments on the topic of 'misgendering / correct sexing'

https://www.legalfeminist.org.uk/2021/07/05/is-misgendering-always-harassment/
I identify as a Sword because I have abstract social constructs e.g. honour and patriotism. My preferred pronouns are "kill/ maim/ dismember"

Quite handy with weapons - available for hire to defeat money laundering crooks around the world.

“Forget safety. Live where you fear to live.” Rumi

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63431
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1851 on: June 05, 2023, 09:26:50 PM »

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63431
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1852 on: June 06, 2023, 10:13:08 AM »

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63431
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1853 on: June 06, 2023, 10:14:25 AM »

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63431
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1854 on: June 06, 2023, 04:43:28 PM »
Who have now posted the below. No apology for their racism.

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63431
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1855 on: June 06, 2023, 04:55:07 PM »

Aruntraveller

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10898
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1856 on: June 07, 2023, 08:54:41 AM »
An interesting article in the Spectator (not my usual hunting ground) about Gay Pride or rather Pride as it has been rebranded now.

It articulates many of the things I feel about Pride and links to the ongoing takeover of LGB by T.

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/how-pride-lost-itself/

I won't be attending any pride events this year as I feel it really doesn't reflect how I feel as a gay man. Which is sad.

Still I am old, and nobody loves a fairy over 40  ;)
Before we work on Artificial Intelligence shouldn't we address the problem of natural stupidity.

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63431
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1857 on: June 07, 2023, 12:04:37 PM »
Scottish Labour can fuck off


https://archive.ph/AIxGt

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32112
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1858 on: June 07, 2023, 12:22:04 PM »
An interesting article in the Spectator (not my usual hunting ground) about Gay Pride or rather Pride as it has been rebranded now.

It articulates many of the things I feel about Pride and links to the ongoing takeover of LGB by T.

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/how-pride-lost-itself/

I won't be attending any pride events this year as I feel it really doesn't reflect how I feel as a gay man. Which is sad.

Still I am old, and nobody loves a fairy over 40  ;)

I was thinking about this the other day. You never hear about gay rights anymore. Not only have the TRA's muscled in on the rights of women, but they also seem to have erased all the issues surrounding the LGB part of LGBT.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63431
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1859 on: June 07, 2023, 12:53:02 PM »
I was thinking about this the other day. You never hear about gay rights anymore. Not only have the TRA's muscled in on the rights of women, but they also seem to have erased all the issues surrounding the LGB part of LGBT.
There is an argument that after the legalising of gay marriage there was not much for an organisation like Stonewall to do which would have meant a reduction in grants. The T which was effectively added in 2014 allowed it access to continuing cash. I'm not sure it was a simple calculation like that but it's definitely been a factor.

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32112
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1860 on: June 07, 2023, 01:00:10 PM »
There is an argument that after the legalising of gay marriage there was not much for an organisation like Stonewall to do which would have meant a reduction in grants. The T which was effectively added in 2014 allowed it access to continuing cash. I'm not sure it was a simple calculation like that but it's definitely been a factor.

I've heard that argument before. Stonewall basically achieved what it set out to do so instead of winding itself up, it refocused on a new tangentially related issue. It does seem persuasive.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63431
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1861 on: June 07, 2023, 01:05:29 PM »
An interesting article in the Spectator (not my usual hunting ground) about Gay Pride or rather Pride as it has been rebranded now.

It articulates many of the things I feel about Pride and links to the ongoing takeover of LGB by T.

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/how-pride-lost-itself/

I won't be attending any pride events this year as I feel it really doesn't reflect how I feel as a gay man. Which is sad.

Still I am old, and nobody loves a fairy over 40  ;)
Here's an archived version of article if anyone has problems accessing The Speccie


https://archive.vn/cgmLq



Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63431
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1862 on: June 07, 2023, 01:10:58 PM »
I've heard that argument before. Stonewall basically achieved what it set out to do so instead of winding itself up, it refocused on a new tangentially related issue. It does seem persuasive.
I think there was still a reason for Stonewall continuing though at a reduced level. So they could have been lobbying the govt to think about how to respond to the new laws in Uganda. Something which seems much more important to their mission than touting puberty blockers, but you hardly see mentioned.


« Last Edit: June 07, 2023, 01:39:44 PM by Nearly Sane »

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32112
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1863 on: June 07, 2023, 01:20:09 PM »
I think there was still a reason for Stonewall continuing though at a reduced level. So they could have bern lobbying the govt to think abput how to respond to the new laws in Uganda. Something which seems much more important to their mission than touting puberty blockers, but you hardly see mentioned.

But as you say: that woulds mean less money.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63431
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1864 on: June 07, 2023, 01:43:59 PM »
Couple of other articles on Pride, also from fairies over 40, both of whom I know, and one for over 40 years (allegedly)

https://unherd.com/2023/06/pride-is-no-place-for-homosexuals/


https://www.spiked-online.com/2023/06/07/the-fall-of-pride-cant-come-soon-enough/
« Last Edit: June 07, 2023, 02:04:40 PM by Nearly Sane »

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63431
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1865 on: June 07, 2023, 02:52:54 PM »

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32112
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1866 on: June 08, 2023, 11:59:39 AM »
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63431
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1867 on: June 08, 2023, 12:39:04 PM »
In what way is Nikki Hiltz cheating?
Yep, apologies, my annoyance at the idiocy got the better of me. She isn't cheating.

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63431
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1868 on: June 08, 2023, 02:55:37 PM »
Stephen Daisley is far from my cup of tea. But he's right hear, and Scottish Labour are a bunch of pricks



https://archive.vn/9CysW

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63431
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1869 on: June 08, 2023, 04:55:11 PM »
And Joan Smith on Labour's idiocy over Pauline McNeil


https://unherd.com/thepost/labour-msp-silenced-for-the-duration-of-pride-month/
« Last Edit: June 10, 2023, 11:06:53 AM by Nearly Sane »

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63431
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1870 on: June 10, 2023, 11:08:30 AM »
Man threatens to kill a woman, is arrested, and it is reported as a women's crime.


https://www.theargus.co.uk/news/23580324.portslade-arrest-online-threats-kill-anti-trans-campaigner/
« Last Edit: June 10, 2023, 11:21:38 AM by Nearly Sane »

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63431
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1871 on: June 12, 2023, 01:33:48 PM »
Johns Hopkins and the non men

The Accountant, OBE, KC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8952
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1872 on: June 12, 2023, 05:29:57 PM »
Petition to clarify the definition of "sex" in the Equality Act 2010 - currently being debated in Parliament - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7-9MsJo6-Uo

There is another petition opposing the position that "sex" in the Equality Act 2010 means biological sex.
I identify as a Sword because I have abstract social constructs e.g. honour and patriotism. My preferred pronouns are "kill/ maim/ dismember"

Quite handy with weapons - available for hire to defeat money laundering crooks around the world.

“Forget safety. Live where you fear to live.” Rumi

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63431
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1873 on: June 12, 2023, 05:33:06 PM »
Petition to clarify the definition of "sex" in the Equality Act 2010 - currently being debated in Parliament - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7-9MsJo6-Uo

There is another petition opposing the position that "sex" in the Equality Act 2010 means biological sex.
Worth noting that while it is a debate in Parliament, it's in Westminster Hall, not the HoC.

Aruntraveller

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10898
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1874 on: June 12, 2023, 07:01:04 PM »
Johns Hopkins and the non men

Instead of changing the definition of Lesbian, why don't they just change the definition of "non-binary".

"Confused" or "deluded" should cover it.

Anyway, when they say "non man" - are they talking about a teapot or possibly a crocodile?

Such sloppy use of the English language is very annoying.
Before we work on Artificial Intelligence shouldn't we address the problem of natural stupidity.