E-mail address to contact Admin direct is admin@religionethics followed by .co.uk.
Instead of changing the definition of Lesbian, why don't they just change the definition of "non-binary". "Confused" or "deluded" should cover it.Anyway, when they say "non man" - are they talking about a teapot or possibly a crocodile?Such sloppy use of the English language is very annoying.
Or they could just use sex instead of gender.Lesbian: female who is attracted to females.Gay man: male who is attracted to males.This is just an example of the labelling fallacy. Changing the meaning of the word "lesbian" won't make females who are attracted only to females suddenly want to jump into bed with trans women.
But it does allow them to call men who say they are women lesbians, and to say to women who say they are same sex (not gender) attracted that they are bigots.
Well, they think it allows them to say that and they do seem to have hoodwinked a number of their supporters into believing it. But it hasn't fooled me and I don't suppose it's fooled many lesbians.I also find it interesting that everybody is defined in terms of their relationship to men. i.e. people who are not men. What's the betting that a man came up with these new definitions?
Worth noting that while it is a debate in Parliament, it's in Westminster Hall, not the HoC.
Mermaids attempt to challenge LGB Alliance bring a registered charity fails. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-65340857
Think you've missed a link here?
https://unherd.com/thepost/calls-for-violence-in-the-trans-debate-only-come-from-one-side/Good article on the recent call for violence at Trans Pride on Saturday. A call to violence by a man dressed as a woman against women. "Punch her in the face" is the phrase du jour apparently. A man who has a record of violence but now calls himself Sarah Jane Baker.The Met police intend to take no action but then we wouldn't expect anything less, would we?How I long for the days of Gay Prides gone by when the most provocative thing uttered was "2-4-6-8, is that policeman really straight?"
Labour policy on trans rights and gender recognitionhttps://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/jul/24/labour-will-lead-on-reform-of-transgender-rights-and-we-wont-take-lectures-from-the-divisive-tories
Just to note that Labour MSPs were whipped to vote for the bill in the Scottish Parliament - the article seems to ignore that comoletely.
Yes it does, because this is the Labour policy for the Westminster parliament. i.e. the policy for England and Wales(?).
