Author Topic: Trans rights: a perspective  (Read 122275 times)

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63431
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1950 on: October 29, 2023, 09:49:35 AM »
Helen Joyce on the question of still being heard whike 'cancelled'.


https://thecritic.co.uk/issues/november-2023/playing-nice-hasnt-worked/


Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63431
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1951 on: October 29, 2023, 10:20:04 AM »
And support group for those cancelled

https://archive.vn/ljMpT

I find the silence about this, and the lack of overt support on this board from some who might stand up for women or gay rights somewhat concerning.
« Last Edit: October 29, 2023, 10:22:18 AM by Nearly Sane »

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32106
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1952 on: October 29, 2023, 11:13:46 AM »
And support group for those cancelled

https://archive.vn/ljMpT

I find the silence about this, and the lack of overt support on this board from some who might stand up for women or gay rights somewhat concerning.

There isn't really anything to discuss though. You post your links without comment and we read them, or not. I think most of the people on the board have broadly similar views to you, so there's really nothing to say.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63431
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1953 on: October 29, 2023, 11:23:35 AM »
There isn't really anything to discuss though. You post your links without comment and we read them, or not. I think most of the people on the board have broadly similar views to you, so there's really nothing to say.

I know you do but there are others that I don't who just seem happy to stand to the side. I don't know for example, bluehillside's take. The discussions i've had with Outrider and Prof D on this are now years ago, and they were both apowaring to me to be happy with the idea that men could identify as women.

That Labour, Lib Dems, Greens, and Scot Nats have all issues with supporying women's sex based rights, and when I raise their failures on that posters who might vote for them write nothing does not fill me with confidence that they do agree.
« Last Edit: October 29, 2023, 11:27:23 AM by Nearly Sane »

Aruntraveller

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10898
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1954 on: October 29, 2023, 11:42:40 AM »
Quote
That Labour, Lib Dems, Greens, and Scot Nats have all issues with supporying women's sex based rights, and when I raise their failures on that posters who might vote for them write nothing does not fill me with confidence that they do agree.

It's difficult. What can you do?

As a member of the Labour Party I did contribute views on this matter via some kind of consultation mechanism on the net (seem to have lost the link for it now) but as with a number of issues, whilst the membership that commented was largely in favour of the women's rights side of the argument, it gets sidelined much higher up in the party. Not a good look for a (supposedly) democratic party. Although I do think the recent shift in tone at the top, is partly as a result of these views having registered.
Before we work on Artificial Intelligence shouldn't we address the problem of natural stupidity.

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63431
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1955 on: October 29, 2023, 11:50:56 AM »
It's difficult. What can you do?

As a member of the Labour Party I did contribute views on this matter via some kind of consultation mechanism on the net (seem to have lost the link for it now) but as with a number of issues, whilst the membership that commented was largely in favour of the women's rights side of the argument, it gets sidelined much higher up in the party. Not a good look for a (supposedly) democratic party. Although I do think the recent shift in tone at the top, is partly as a result of these views having registered.
And as with jeremyp, I know your views and that you have spoken up about it. I agree that there have been better signs in Labour recently, but I would be happier if Starmer openly stood up for Rosie Duffield, and Lammy apologised for calling those standing up for women's sex based spaces 'dinosaurs.
« Last Edit: October 29, 2023, 11:54:13 AM by Nearly Sane »

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63431
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1956 on: November 02, 2023, 01:52:46 PM »

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63431

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63431
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1958 on: November 04, 2023, 10:58:02 AM »
Good analysis of the impact


https://unherd.com/thepost/scottish-feminists-lose-appeal-on-definition-of-woman/
And Susan Dalgety on the mess of idiocy that the law and the Scottish govt have achieved. It's good that she highlights the vacuous stupidity of the Scottish Greens with their misogyny.


https://www.scotsman.com/news/opinion/columnists/whether-our-msps-have-the-legislative-nous-and-political-skills-to-resolve-this-mess-remains-to-be-seen-susan-dalgety-4396568

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63431
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1959 on: November 13, 2023, 08:47:39 PM »
Milli Hill on the appointment of Steph Richards to CEO of Endometriosis South West, and his, Richards, interactions with her.

https://millihill.substack.com/p/should-a-man-run-a-womens-charity

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63431
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1960 on: November 14, 2023, 12:03:22 PM »
Hannah Barnes on the issues with setting up a replacement of the gender clinic at the Tavistock.

https://archive.vn/YEYgw

Aruntraveller

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10898
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1961 on: November 18, 2023, 10:44:19 PM »
Before we work on Artificial Intelligence shouldn't we address the problem of natural stupidity.

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63431
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1962 on: November 21, 2023, 01:22:25 PM »
Interview with a women professional pool player refusing to participate against men in women's events.


https://archive.li/xGyB2#selection-3013.4-3017.120

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32106
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1963 on: November 21, 2023, 01:32:52 PM »
Trouble in football

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/67482965

Quote
Four clubs reportedly withdrew from matches against Rossington Main Ladies after a shot by Francesca Needham [a trans woman] injured an opposition player.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63431

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32106
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1965 on: November 21, 2023, 01:56:42 PM »
Decision in cricket


https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/67470009

hmmm that seemed easy. I wonder why the FA is making such a meal of it.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63431
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1966 on: November 21, 2023, 08:43:01 PM »

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32106
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1967 on: November 22, 2023, 12:05:51 PM »
Meanwhile in Ancient Rome...


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-67484645


Ffs!

Ah yes. Elagabalus.

There are three sources on him but only one - Cassius Dio - mentions the trans gender bit. Cassius Dio also says he raped a vestal virgin and forced her to marry him and that he tortured the children of several Roman noblemen. But hey ho.

The following video examines the evidence.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lI3Ek8bO8uk
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63431
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1968 on: November 22, 2023, 12:14:37 PM »
Ah yes. Elagabalus.

There are three sources on him but only one - Cassius Dio - mentions the trans gender bit. Cassius Dio also says he raped a vestal virgin and forced her to marry him and that he tortured the children of several Roman noblemen. But hey ho.

The following video examines the evidence.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lI3Ek8bO8uk
He often features in lists as the 'worst Roman emperor of all time' so I had to admit being bemused when I heard him being picked as an example. I have severe doubts about a lot of the more outré stories about Roman emperors, and for similar reasons, popes. They have a strong whiff of propaganda about them.

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63431
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1969 on: November 22, 2023, 02:25:43 PM »
Ah yes. Elagabalus.

There are three sources on him but only one - Cassius Dio - mentions the trans gender bit. Cassius Dio also says he raped a vestal virgin and forced her to marry him and that he tortured the children of several Roman noblemen. But hey ho.

The following video examines the evidence.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lI3Ek8bO8uk
Now watched the whole video, really rather jolly. I have to love anyone calling themself Metatron. I was a bit surprised that he didn't cover that a lot of this echoes what was said about Sulla, Julius Caesar, Caligula, Nero, etc etc...

There's an approach that could be taken that those that were trans in ancient Rome were then vilified because of their transness and that the other actions should be ignored. It would be obviously partial and unevidenced but you could portray a pattern for the instances I've mentioned.

I'm also reminded of the scandal of Publius Clodius at the rites of Bona Dea, link below, which I am sure must now have a 'trans' interpretation on the web somewhere.

https://www.historyskills.com/classroom/ancient-history/bona-dea-scandal/

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63431
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1970 on: November 23, 2023, 08:12:30 AM »
Adult Human Female is shown eventually at Edinburgh University

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-67504202

Can be watched here

https://youtu.be/94HFMSm-JBo?si=egBe3mA70PZoNqEM





Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63431
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1973 on: November 23, 2023, 07:00:26 PM »


"But the obvious question is how we got here: the point where this level of security is needed for the screening of a film in which people discuss views they are perfectly entitled to hold."

Indeed


https://archive.vn/YI34T

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63431
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #1974 on: November 24, 2023, 10:29:26 AM »
Excellent piece by Victoria Smith in reaction to an article from Kenny Farquarson about the decision in the case brought by For Women Scotland recently. The Farquarson article is the second link and contains in his comment that:

“womanhood in all its glory”  be “capacious enough, generous enough, diverse enough, to accommodate and perhaps even to welcome a small number of people who did not start life’s journey as women”, an indication of such patronising smug prickery that it is 'deserving' of some sort of award.

https://thecritic.co.uk/ive-done-the-work-thanks/


https://archive.vn/xW2Ej