Author Topic: Trans rights: a perspective  (Read 122181 times)

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32106
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #2025 on: February 29, 2024, 05:41:33 PM »
Alex Massie on the Scarlet Blake case


https://archive.vn/4nllY

I don't really understand the kerfuffle. It's just a pronoun. Do people really think that describing Blake as a woman means their crimes reflect badly on all women?

As long as we are sensible about the consequences i.e. that the crime is recorded as having been committed by a male identifying as a woman and that Blake will serve his* sentence in a men's prison (as the Ministry of Justice has already stated), I think we should move on.

* now that Blake is a convicted murderer and cat killer, we can dispense with the courtesy of pretending he is a woman.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63428
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #2026 on: February 29, 2024, 05:43:43 PM »
I don't really understand the kerfuffle. It's just a pronoun. Do people really think that describing Blake as a woman means their crimes reflect badly on all women?

As long as we are sensible about the consequences i.e. that the crime is recorded as having been committed by a male identifying as a woman and that Blake will serve his* sentence in a men's prison (as the Ministry of Justice has already stated), I think we should move on.

* now that Blake is a convicted murderer and cat killer, we can dispense with the courtesy of pretending he is a woman.
I think you'll find it's a noun - woman rather than a pronoun. It is about Blake bring referred to as a woman, the crime being recorded as a woman. And that it was being reported after his conviction by being committed by a woman.
« Last Edit: February 29, 2024, 08:24:07 PM by Nearly Sane »

Aruntraveller

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10898
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #2027 on: March 01, 2024, 10:58:13 AM »
I found the report on BBC News misleading when I saw it on Breakfast TV earlier in the week. They referred to Blake as a woman throughout, with no mention of being Trans or a man. The photo of him was at my cursory glance enough to convince me it was a woman. It did register with me at the time that it was odd that a woman had committed this crime, overwhemingly male crime etc., but there are always exceptions.

IT was only later elsewhere on social media that I found out it was a man. It does not sit well with me that the BBC did not refer to the correct sex of the person involved.

As NS has already said the recording of such crime correctly is important and not something that should be left to the whim of an individual who thinks they are female.
Before we work on Artificial Intelligence shouldn't we address the problem of natural stupidity.

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63428
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #2028 on: March 01, 2024, 09:01:09 PM »

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63428
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #2029 on: March 03, 2024, 10:43:51 PM »
Hadley Freeman on the Scarlet Blake case


https://archive.ph/QMA93

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63428
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #2030 on: March 06, 2024, 07:35:35 PM »

Victoria Smith on 'The hidden cost of pronoun politeness'


https://thecritic.co.uk/the-hidden-cost-of-pronoun-politeness/

SteveH

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10141
  • God? She's black.
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #2031 on: March 06, 2024, 09:52:11 PM »
Much as I hate agreeing with anything in the Tufton Street Bugle, I think she's got a point.
When conspiracy nuts start spouting their bollocks, the best answer is "That's what they want you to think".

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32106
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #2032 on: March 07, 2024, 08:33:57 AM »
I think you'll find it's a noun - woman rather than a pronoun. It is about Blake bring referred to as a woman, the crime being recorded as a woman.
That would be wrong. It should be recorded as having been committed by a male.

Quote
And that it was being reported after his conviction by being committed by a woman.
So what? It doesn't taint all women. Why are you so intent on dying on this hill?
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63428
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #2033 on: March 07, 2024, 09:03:16 AM »
That would be wrong. It should be recorded as having been committed by a male.
So what? It doesn't taint all women. Why are you so intent on dying on this hill?
You don't think facts are important in reporting crime?

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63428
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #2034 on: March 07, 2024, 09:20:07 PM »
'JK Rowling reported to police by trans activist India Willoughby for misgendering'. Willoughby is a bloke.


https://www.msn.com/en-gb/entertainment/music/jk-rowling-reported-to-police-by-trans-activist-india-willoughby-for-misgendering/ar-BB1juxxE

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63428
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #2035 on: March 08, 2024, 06:18:09 PM »
Suzanne Moore
'I won’t sacrifice my safety just so a trans woman feels validated'


https://archive.vn/F28Jl

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63428

Aruntraveller

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10898
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #2037 on: March 11, 2024, 10:06:13 AM »
A lengthy article by Andrew Doyle about the pressure that the Trans lobby is putting on gay people:

https://unherd.com/2024/03/the-ugly-return-of-homophobia/

Doyle is not one of my favourite commentators but he has a point even if he somewhat overplays the "progressive" card.
Before we work on Artificial Intelligence shouldn't we address the problem of natural stupidity.

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63428
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #2038 on: March 20, 2024, 04:23:28 PM »
Woman getting sued for, amongst other things, saying 'only women menstruate'


https://www.personneltoday.com/hr/gender-critical-employee-network-defra-seen-duemmer-wrigley/

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63428
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #2039 on: March 20, 2024, 05:00:55 PM »

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63428
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #2040 on: April 01, 2024, 07:55:38 AM »
Moderator Announcement Thread is locked for review, see Mod thread on Board being reported to Police Scotland under Hate Crime Act.


https://www.religionethics.co.uk/index.php?topic=21405.msg882565#msg882565


Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63428
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #2041 on: April 01, 2024, 08:37:49 PM »
Moderator Announcement Thread is locked for review, see Mod thread on Board being reported to Police Scotland under Hate Crime Act.


https://www.religionethics.co.uk/index.php?topic=21405.msg882565#msg882565
As per thread, this now appears to have been a joke. Thread unlocked

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63428
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #2042 on: April 02, 2024, 07:05:29 PM »
Jk Rowling's post not being treated as criminal, though not sure if there has been an investigation.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-68712471

It is worrying though that Dr Nick McKerrell, a senior law lecturer at Glasgow Caledonian University said

 "On balance I think she probably won't be prosecuted because the test in the legislation states that you have to be threatening and abusive to someone with your language which essentially means that you have to cause them fear and alarm.

 think it's close to the edge but I don't think, as it stands, those communications do that"


Aruntraveller

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10898
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #2043 on: April 03, 2024, 10:16:27 AM »
Julie Burchill going on an enjoyable rant about Daniel Radcliffe in Spiked:

https://www.spiked-online.com/2023/04/14/the-entitlement-and-ignorance-of-daniel-radcliffe/

I don't always agree with her, but she is not wrong here.
Before we work on Artificial Intelligence shouldn't we address the problem of natural stupidity.

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32106
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #2044 on: April 03, 2024, 10:52:18 AM »
Julie Burchill going on an enjoyable rant about Daniel Radcliffe in Spiked:

https://www.spiked-online.com/2023/04/14/the-entitlement-and-ignorance-of-daniel-radcliffe/

I don't always agree with her, but she is not wrong here.

I never really rated her, but that was an impressive piece of writing.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Aruntraveller

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10898
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #2045 on: April 03, 2024, 10:58:43 AM »
I never really rated her, but that was an impressive piece of writing.

I agree. I remember when she used to write for one of the music papers (NME?) and I detested her then. Either she's mellowed or I have.
Before we work on Artificial Intelligence shouldn't we address the problem of natural stupidity.

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63428
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #2046 on: April 05, 2024, 01:46:18 PM »
 The Problem With Saying ‘Sex Assigned at Birth’

Short version: because it's antiscientific bollocks used to appease those with a religious belief in a form of soul.

https://archive.ph/P05Ci

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63428
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #2047 on: April 09, 2024, 09:25:55 AM »
Suzanne Moore - "Trans children have been lied to by adults – the Cass report may now see the legal dam break"

The damage that will have been done to people by not maintaining critical empirical methods around trans ideology is made all the more tragic because it was motivated by attempts to be nice. Just there are certain times when that is  a deeply flawed approach.


https://archive.is/GHfGo

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32106
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #2048 on: April 09, 2024, 04:47:57 PM »
Netball has a policy on trans women playing in women's internationals. tl;dr they can't

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/netball/68767815

This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63428
Re: Trans rights: a perspective
« Reply #2049 on: April 09, 2024, 07:02:32 PM »
Netball has a policy on trans women playing in women's internationals. tl;dr they can't

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/netball/68767815
Should be at all levels where there are sex categories.