What's your evidence for that?
I do not know about the medical ins and outs of men growing breasts to breast feed but your article says it could be done although not exclusively.
It may be a bad idea and delusional but it doesn't therefore follow that the motive is a sexual fetish.
You think men are taking drugs to grow "breasts" in order to feed babies? You think that's their primary motivation?
The baby has a mother, as all babies do, and if the mother isn't able to feed it there are alternatives that don't involve making an infant swallow discharge from pharmaceutically induced gynaecomastia. That you can't see the sick perversion involved is disturbing. If a man was doing this while not calling himself a woman, would that be alright?
Quote from Stranger on a different thread, on a different subject: "That people insist on trying to justify this insanity is testament to how faith can destroy reasoning".
This is where we are. New born babies are being abused for the "validation" of mentally ill men, and all the so-called "progressives" care about are the feelings of the men.
