NM,
Hmmm...No such things as emotional laws? Tell that to all those who are bullied on a regular basis...How it leaves them drained and defenceless. How the bully tricks and deceives to appease an inner emotional need. The same emotional laws that are often portrayed as being more painful than serious physical injury.
This’ll be lost on you, but that’s an error in thinking called a
non sequitur. That bullying is emotionally damaging does not mean that there’s such a thing as “emotional laws”. You’d have all your work ahead of you do show that such laws exist.
Your reluctance to accept the science because you don't understand it just tells us how divorced you are from Biblical speak. Jesus alone talks of the genetic response that a healthier attitude breeds...he says ignore the injury but safeguard your emotional strength...not in those words, but in these words, that if someone hits you in the face, turn the other cheek.
Stop lying. I don’t refuse “to accept the science because (I) don't understand it” at all. What I actually do is refuse to accept
your spurious claim to science on the reasonable grounds that you’re entirely indifferent to (or unaware of) the characteristics necessary for the status "science" to apply. “It makes sense in my head” (which is all you have) does not make something science: observation, hypothesis, evidence, testing, theory, peer review, publication etc on the other hand – none of which you have – does. And that’s your problem.
Now...
You can’t have a “now” when your prior effort has just collapsed in a heap.
…religion perpetuates Christian love, caring and kindness…
Some does, some doesn’t. In either case though it doesn't invent it.
…whilst those with no interest…
No interest in what?
…make silly quotes like the footnote about Arthur C Clarke's which says religion isn't required for a good attitude, but, without Jesus Christ's teaching why is there a global congregation, a global, cancerous tumour, of the most appalling attitudes conceivable.
There isn’t “a global congregation, a global, cancerous tumour, of the most appalling attitudes conceivable” – that’s just something else you’ve made up.
So which fundamentally are you would you say – delusional or dishonest?