You said plainly and clearly that Christianity is not a principle set in British law and I have shown you two features of British Law where this principle is sold to the public as being valid. If your monarch swears allegiance to Almighty God and she represents the highest office in British Law then we must accept that is the case so lies and misrepresentation don't come into the matter...but confusion in knowing what is straight, honest, and scientific does.
Again I didn't say that. To repeat, what I said was
'Saying that your ideals and principles are aligned with the Holy Bible is just saying that you prefer honesty, harmony, peace, happiness and love as your path through life. That is a principle carved into British Law. When you stand in a court of law and raise your right hand you are saying you will uphold those principles'
Is incorrect. At no point even if you do swear on the Bible, which is not compulsory, so you say anything about harmony, peace, happiness, or live as a path through life. There is some commitment to telling the truth but nothing about that being the path through life. '
Leaving aside your continual misrepresentation, and indeed misunderstanding about the idea of 'British Law ' which is not a single entity Christianity isn't set as principle in the law. It might be useful for to learn that the monarch is head of the Church only established in England, and isn't a British or English Law office.
So once again stop lying.