Author Topic: Lawrence Krauss  (Read 16301 times)


SteveH

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10411
  • God? She's black.
Re: Lawrence Krauss
« Reply #1 on: August 28, 2018, 11:16:18 PM »
And...?
I once tried using "chicken" as a password, but was told it must contain a capital so I tried "chickenkiev"
On another occasion, I tried "beefstew", but was told it wasn't stroganoff.

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33225
Re: Lawrence Krauss
« Reply #2 on: August 29, 2018, 06:39:37 AM »
And...?

Who knew? What did they know, when did they know it?

Gordon

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18274
Re: Lawrence Krauss
« Reply #3 on: August 29, 2018, 07:59:10 AM »
Who knew? What did they know, when did they know it?

Since it is being dealt with by relevant authorities why are you so bothered?

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33225
Re: Lawrence Krauss
« Reply #4 on: August 29, 2018, 10:15:28 AM »
Since it is being dealt with by relevant authorities why are you so bothered?
Conversely Gordon I could ask you why you are so keen for it not to be discussed.
The supression of Krauss activity and this behaviour in the skeptic and antitheist community has been publicly acknowledged by the Ameican humanist societies.

Finally I have not seen similar intervention in cases of Catholic abuse whi ch is being dealt with.

Rhiannon

  • Guest
Re: Lawrence Krauss
« Reply #5 on: August 29, 2018, 12:02:22 PM »
Trolling.

Gordon

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18274
Re: Lawrence Krauss
« Reply #6 on: August 29, 2018, 12:24:22 PM »
Conversely Gordon I could ask you why you are so keen for it not to be discussed.
The supression of Krauss activity and this behaviour in the skeptic and antitheist community has been publicly acknowledged by the Ameican humanist societies.

Finally I have not seen similar intervention in cases of Catholic abuse whi ch is being dealt with.

Nope: the matter is in the public domain, where one clue is the link you yourself posted, which indicates the matter is being pursued.

So, stop being a silly obsessive.

SwordOfTheSpirit

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 734
Re: Lawrence Krauss
« Reply #7 on: August 29, 2018, 12:59:11 PM »
Nope: the matter is in the public domain, where one clue is the link you yourself posted, which indicates the matter is being pursued.

So, stop being a silly obsessive.
This, from the poster who is doing exactly what he is claiming shouldn't be done, namely being a silly obsessive
I haven't enough faith to be an atheist.

Aruntraveller

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11087
Re: Lawrence Krauss
« Reply #8 on: August 29, 2018, 01:02:42 PM »
This, from the poster who is doing exactly what he is claiming shouldn't be done, namely being a silly obsessive

Fish can't swim.

Thought I would add that as we seem to be in the territory of making completely bogus statements.
Before we work on Artificial Intelligence shouldn't we address the problem of natural stupidity.

Gordon

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18274
Re: Lawrence Krauss
« Reply #9 on: August 29, 2018, 01:07:21 PM »
This, from the poster who is doing exactly what he is claiming shouldn't be done, namely being a silly obsessive

You know you really should read some earlier threads on this before you go on to make a fool of yourself: Vlad is fixated on LK, he's bored us to death on the matter before, and I'm just telling him to stop being so silly.

BeRational

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8645
Re: Lawrence Krauss
« Reply #10 on: August 29, 2018, 01:46:32 PM »
You know you really should read some earlier threads on this before you go on to make a fool of yourself: Vlad is fixated on LK, he's bored us to death on the matter before, and I'm just telling him to stop being so silly.

And Dawkins, don't forget Dawkins!
I see gullible people, everywhere!

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32509
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Lawrence Krauss
« Reply #11 on: August 29, 2018, 02:11:22 PM »
Conversely Gordon I could ask you why you are so keen for it not to be discussed.
The supression of Krauss activity and this behaviour in the skeptic and antitheist community has been publicly acknowledged by the Ameican humanist societies.

What?

If it's been suppressed, how come we all know about it? How come his employers launched an investigation into his actions and instead of hiding them or quietly moving him to a different university are applying sanctions?
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33225
Re: Lawrence Krauss
« Reply #12 on: August 29, 2018, 05:54:46 PM »
Nope: the matter is in the public domain, where one clue is the link you yourself posted, which indicates the matter is being pursued.

So, stop being a silly obsessive.
Now we have got past you not commenting negatively on those posting about prominent catholics in abuse cases while calling those who post about prominent antitheists in abuse cases, silly obsessives......let's repeat the 101 on the significant questions the Krauss case raises

Since this happened at a conference who knew? When did they know? what did they know?

Sam Harris and Matt Dillahunty distanced themselves from Krauss at around the same time as his suspension from ASU and it's prominently reported in Buzzfeed earlier this year.


Finally what authorities do you think are dealing with this?

I have to inform you that ASU have ruled that he has broken their rules on harassment.

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33225
Re: Lawrence Krauss
« Reply #13 on: August 29, 2018, 06:02:43 PM »
What?

If it's been suppressed, how come we all know about it? How come his employers launched an investigation into his actions and instead of hiding them or quietly moving him to a different university are applying sanctions?

What is it you know?

If you all know about it please direct me to a post on this forum condemning it or even raising it...rather than move along it's being dealt with.

Meanwhile, Matt Dillahunty, Sam Harris, The organisers of this years Dawkins/Krauss Australian conference and the American Humanist association have taken concrete action. Whether it is enough and acted as promptly as they should I know not.

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33225
Re: Lawrence Krauss
« Reply #14 on: August 29, 2018, 06:05:39 PM »
You know you really should read some earlier threads on this before you go on to make a fool of yourself: Vlad is fixated on LK, he's bored us to death on the matter before, and I'm just telling him to stop being so silly.
O yes Laurence Krauss (It seems noteven Gordon dare speak his name) is a totally inappropriate topic for discussion on a thread about atheism.

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33225
Re: Lawrence Krauss
« Reply #15 on: August 29, 2018, 06:07:34 PM »
And Dawkins, don't forget Dawkins!

Be Rational thinks that Dawkins is not a suitable topic for discussion on a board about Atheism!!!

Rhiannon

  • Guest
Re: Lawrence Krauss
« Reply #16 on: August 29, 2018, 06:36:55 PM »
You are making yourself look like an arse, Vlad. Shut up.

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33225
Re: Lawrence Krauss
« Reply #17 on: August 29, 2018, 06:46:38 PM »
You are making yourself look like an arse, Vlad. Shut up.

Unlikely.

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32509
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Lawrence Krauss
« Reply #18 on: August 29, 2018, 06:49:45 PM »
If you all know about it please direct me to a post on this forum condemning it or even raising it...rather than move along it's being dealt with.
We had a whole thread about Krauss back in March.

http://www.religionethics.co.uk/index.php?topic=15334.0

Quote
Meanwhile, Matt Dillahunty, Sam Harris, The organisers of this years Dawkins/Krauss Australian conference and the American Humanist association have taken concrete action. Whether it is enough and acted as promptly as they should I know not.
Krauss has been under investigation for ages. I really don't know what your point is.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33225
Re: Lawrence Krauss
« Reply #19 on: August 29, 2018, 06:53:28 PM »
We had a whole thread about Krauss back in March.


That was months ago.

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33225
Re: Lawrence Krauss
« Reply #20 on: August 29, 2018, 06:55:31 PM »
We had a whole thread about Krauss back in March.

http://www.religionethics.co.uk/index.php?topic=15334.0
Krauss has been under investigation for ages. I really don't know what your point is.

OK.....once more with feeling...…….Who knew?...……….. What did they know?...……….when did they know?

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32509
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Lawrence Krauss
« Reply #21 on: August 29, 2018, 06:55:35 PM »
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32509
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Lawrence Krauss
« Reply #22 on: August 29, 2018, 06:56:21 PM »
OK.....once more with feeling...…….Who knew?...……….. What did they know?...……….when did they know?
Well clearly we knew since we had a thread about it back in March.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33225
Re: Lawrence Krauss
« Reply #23 on: August 29, 2018, 06:56:41 PM »
Bingo!

Is that a quote from Krauss?

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32509
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Lawrence Krauss
« Reply #24 on: August 29, 2018, 06:59:34 PM »
Is that a quote from Krauss?
No. It's a quote from jeremyp.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply