Author Topic: Lawrence Krauss  (Read 16290 times)

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33225
Re: Lawrence Krauss
« Reply #150 on: March 10, 2019, 08:41:06 PM »
Krauss speaking fluently and persuasively about what he's professionally best known for:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKapUWxTvWI
I wonder how appropriate this is here. Firstly If it is science, that being his profession then it should be in the science and technology section rather than here. Secondly if this had been a similar thread on , say, Kevin Spacey would anyone have put links to two of his greatest performances and risk looking like endorsing a reputation? I don't know but this notion of shunning works and performances seems topical March 2019.


jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32509
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Lawrence Krauss
« Reply #151 on: March 12, 2019, 10:15:25 AM »
I wonder how appropriate this is here. Firstly If it is science, that being his profession then it should be in the science and technology section rather than here. Secondly if this had been a similar thread on , say, Kevin Spacey would anyone have put links to two of his greatest performances and risk looking like endorsing a reputation? I don't know but this notion of shunning works and performances seems topical March 2019.

Why is a discussion of a person's alleged sexual misconduct appropriate in the theism and atheism section?
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33225
Re: Lawrence Krauss
« Reply #152 on: March 12, 2019, 10:38:07 AM »
Why is a discussion of a person's alleged sexual misconduct appropriate in the theism and atheism section?
The same reason the sexual misconduct of Christian persons is appropriate on the Christian section I would imagine.


To support a forum for the discussion of Christian sexual misconduct and refuse one for atheist behaviour of any stripe would smack of censorship and suppression don't you think?


Don't forget the action of several antitheist and atheist groups against sexual misconduct was praised on this thread. I didn't notice objection to that.

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32509
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Lawrence Krauss
« Reply #153 on: March 12, 2019, 07:21:58 PM »
The same reason the sexual misconduct of Christian persons is appropriate on the Christian section I would imagine.
What reason is that?
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33225
Re: Lawrence Krauss
« Reply #154 on: March 12, 2019, 08:46:46 PM »
What reason is that?
It's traditional
Just like the tradition of not challenging that tradition.

And yet here we are with people debating whether the same should be applied to figures in the antitheist community...….and yes. Before we go through the rigmarole Krauss is a self announced antitheist.

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32509
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Lawrence Krauss
« Reply #155 on: March 19, 2019, 09:59:37 AM »
It's traditional
Just like the tradition of not challenging that tradition.
What's traditional? That church officials sexually assault children or that we talk about it in the Christian section of the forum?
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply