Author Topic: Finalists for the £50 note portrait must be scientists  (Read 2862 times)

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33219
Finalists for the £50 note portrait must be scientists
« on: November 02, 2018, 09:41:34 AM »
Stephen Hawking.

I think Thatcher might qualify for her work on mixtures.

Dawkins? Might have spent too much time in popular science.

SteveH

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10410
  • God? She's black.
Re: Finalists for the £50 note portrait must be scientists
« Reply #1 on: November 02, 2018, 10:05:15 AM »
Fucking Thatcher? Fuck the fuck off!
I have a pet termite. His name is Clint. Clint eats wood.

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33219
Re: Finalists for the £50 note portrait must be scientists
« Reply #2 on: November 02, 2018, 10:11:45 AM »
Fucking Thatcher? Fuck the fuck off!
Apparently there was a failed Gammon crusade to have Thatcher on the £50 pound note but support for her was less than a unicorn to be on there.
Then to avoid another boatyard mcboatface (a comedy vote dry run for Brexit) they chose scientists to be the theme.

Stranger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8236
  • Lightly seared on the reality grill.
Re: Finalists for the £50 note portrait must be scientists
« Reply #3 on: November 02, 2018, 10:20:24 AM »
Dawkins? Might have spent too much time in popular science.

He's disqualified by being alive. Apparently only dead people are allowed: Think science for the new £50 note.
x(∅ ∈ x ∧ ∀y(yxy ∪ {y} ∈ x))

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33219
Re: Finalists for the £50 note portrait must be scientists
« Reply #4 on: November 02, 2018, 10:23:42 AM »
He's disqualified by being alive. Apparently only dead people are allowed: Think science for the new £50 note.
So we are to be deprived of a depiction of his wonderful hair......mind you Einsteins would have been harder to Forge.

Newton had wonderful hair but that might have been a wig.

SteveH

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10410
  • God? She's black.
Re: Finalists for the £50 note portrait must be scientists
« Reply #5 on: November 02, 2018, 10:36:31 AM »
It'll probably be Hawking, he having recently handed in his dinner-pail, but other candidates might be:
Alexander Fleming;
Isaac Newton;
Robert Boyle;
Rosalind Franklin;
Ada Lovelace;
Charles Babbage;
Beatrix Potter.*

*She came up in a list of female British scientists. Apparently, her work in mycology was highly respected.
I have a pet termite. His name is Clint. Clint eats wood.

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33219
Re: Finalists for the £50 note portrait must be scientists
« Reply #6 on: November 02, 2018, 10:40:19 AM »
It'll probably be Hawking, he having recently handed in his dinner-pail, but other candidates might be:
Alexander Fleming;
Isaac Newton;
Robert Boyle;
Rosalind Franklin;
Ada Lovelace;
Charles Babbage;
Beatrix Potter.*

*She came up in a list of female British scientists. Apparently, her work in mycology was highly respected.
Yes when asked about her love for mycology she said it was a fungi to be with.

SteveH

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10410
  • God? She's black.
Re: Finalists for the £50 note portrait must be scientists
« Reply #7 on: November 02, 2018, 10:43:42 AM »
Yes when asked about her love for mycology she said it was a fungi to be with.
But it didn't leave mushroom in her diary for other activities.
« Last Edit: November 02, 2018, 10:51:10 AM by Steve H »
I have a pet termite. His name is Clint. Clint eats wood.

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33219
Re: Finalists for the £50 note portrait must be scientists
« Reply #8 on: November 02, 2018, 10:49:51 AM »
But ut didn't leave mushroom in her diary for other activities.
Apparently she was named for her mother who could Balance a pint of stout on the back of one hand, a pint of bitter on the other and a pint of lager on her head all at the same time.

SteveH

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10410
  • God? She's black.
Re: Finalists for the £50 note portrait must be scientists
« Reply #9 on: November 02, 2018, 10:52:55 AM »
Apparently she was named for her mother who could Balance a pint of stout on the back of one hand, a pint of bitter on the other and a pint of lager on her head all at the same time.
Hop it with your terrible puns!
I have a pet termite. His name is Clint. Clint eats wood.

SteveH

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10410
  • God? She's black.
Re: Finalists for the £50 note portrait must be scientists
« Reply #10 on: November 02, 2018, 10:55:28 AM »
Apparently she was named for her mother who could Balance a pint of stout on the back of one hand, a pint of bitter on the other and a pint of lager on her head all at the same time.
While Morris-dancing and farting La Marseillaise?
I have a pet termite. His name is Clint. Clint eats wood.

Rhiannon

  • Guest
Re: Finalists for the £50 note portrait must be scientists
« Reply #11 on: November 02, 2018, 11:09:59 AM »
It'll probably be Hawking, he having recently handed in his dinner-pail, but other candidates might be:
Alexander Fleming;
Isaac Newton;
Robert Boyle;
Rosalind Franklin;
Ada Lovelace;
Charles Babbage;
Beatrix Potter.*

*She came up in a list of female British scientists. Apparently, her work in mycology was highly respected.

Alan Turing

Robbie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7512
Re: Finalists for the £50 note portrait must be scientists
« Reply #12 on: November 02, 2018, 11:11:43 AM »
Didn't we have Charles Babbage on something already? Years ago*.

I'd go for Alan Turing.

*No, a 22p postage stamp 1991. Dunno why I remembered that.
« Last Edit: November 02, 2018, 11:15:14 AM by Robbie »
True Wit is Nature to Advantage drest,
          What oft was Thought, but ne’er so well Exprest

Rhiannon

  • Guest
Re: Finalists for the £50 note portrait must be scientists
« Reply #13 on: November 02, 2018, 11:47:33 AM »
Didn't we have Charles Babbage on something already? Years ago*.

I'd go for Alan Turing.

*No, a 22p postage stamp 1991. Dunno why I remembered that.

I think Turing might make some people uncomfortable with our past and how we treated people. It does me. And that's no bad thing, especially with the return of right wing values.

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32509
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Finalists for the £50 note portrait must be scientists
« Reply #14 on: November 02, 2018, 11:54:50 AM »
Stephen Hawking.

I think Thatcher might qualify for her work on mixtures.

Dawkins? Might have spent too much time in popular science.

I think Stephen Hawking is too recent. Margaret Thatcher isn't known as a scientist and Richard Dawkins is still alive.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32509
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Finalists for the £50 note portrait must be scientists
« Reply #15 on: November 02, 2018, 11:56:36 AM »
It'll probably be Hawking, he having recently handed in his dinner-pail, but other candidates might be:
Alexander Fleming;
Isaac Newton;
Robert Boyle;
Rosalind Franklin;
Ada Lovelace;
Charles Babbage;
Beatrix Potter.*

*She came up in a list of female British scientists. Apparently, her work in mycology was highly respected.
Isaac Newton was on the last £1 note.

I thought about Rosalind Franklin, but if her, why not Francis Crick?
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

Nearly Sane

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64353
Re: Finalists for the £50 note portrait must be scientists
« Reply #16 on: November 02, 2018, 12:04:40 PM »
Lovelace for me. I might have suggested Mary Somerville, but as she is on the RBS tenner, doesn't seem correct to be on two current UK notes.


In addition for consideration James Clerk Maxwell.

Walt Zingmatilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33219
Re: Finalists for the £50 note portrait must be scientists
« Reply #17 on: November 02, 2018, 03:17:46 PM »
Lovelace for me. I might have suggested Mary Somerville,

In addition for consideration James Clerk Maxwell.
Is that Ada or Linda?
« Last Edit: November 02, 2018, 03:27:09 PM by Phyllis Tyne »

jeremyp

  • Admin Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32509
  • Blurb
    • Sincere Flattery: A blog about computing
Re: Finalists for the £50 note portrait must be scientists
« Reply #18 on: November 02, 2018, 03:55:00 PM »
Is that Ada or Linda?
Linda Lovelace was not a scientist.
This post and all of JeremyP's posts words certified 100% divinely inspired* -- signed God.
*Platinum infallibility package, terms and conditions may apply

SteveH

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10410
  • God? She's black.
I have a pet termite. His name is Clint. Clint eats wood.

SusanDoris

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8265
Re: Finalists for the £50 note portrait must be scientists
« Reply #20 on: November 03, 2018, 10:09:10 AM »
James Clarke-Maxwwell, yes, bhut he was more of a mathematician, wasn't he, even though he was way ahead of his time, creating equations or something which turned out to be just what was needed for quantum mechanics.

James Glaisher would be a good candidate for me at the moment - 'The Weather Experiment' by Peter Moor, he is one of the main characters in the search for an understanding of the weather and  and analysis of it. He discovered what dew is and its dew point amongst his other prolific work and reports etc.
« Last Edit: November 03, 2018, 10:11:50 AM by SusanDoris »
The Most Honourable Sister of Titular Indecision.

Stranger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8236
  • Lightly seared on the reality grill.
Re: Finalists for the £50 note portrait must be scientists
« Reply #21 on: November 03, 2018, 11:08:21 AM »
James Clarke-Maxwwell, yes, bhut he was more of a mathematician, wasn't he, even though he was way ahead of his time, creating equations or something which turned out to be just what was needed for quantum mechanics.

He produced the (rather beautiful) classical theory of electromagnetism which predicted electromagnetic waves with a speed that was remarkably similar to the (already known) speed of light, and hence discovered the nature of light and predicted radio waves. The fact that the speed of light was a constant, was used by Einstein in the development of Special Relativity.

Having said all that, I'm inclined towards Alan Turing (who was a mathematician) for the reasons Rhiannon gave in #13.
x(∅ ∈ x ∧ ∀y(yxy ∪ {y} ∈ x))

Roses

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7990
Re: Finalists for the £50 note portrait must be scientists
« Reply #22 on: November 03, 2018, 11:51:12 AM »
Stephen Hawking gets my vote.
"At the going down of the sun and in the morning we will remember them."

SusanDoris

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8265
Re: Finalists for the £50 note portrait must be scientists
« Reply #23 on: November 03, 2018, 12:13:30 PM »
James Clarke-Maxwwell, yes, bhut he was more of a mathematician, wasn't he, even though he was way ahead of his time, creating equations or something which turned out to be just what was needed for quantum mechanics.

James Glaisher would be a good candidate for me at the moment - 'The Weather Experiment' by Peter Moor, he is one of the main characters in the search for an understanding of the weather and  and analysis of it. He discovered what dew is and its dew point amongst his other prolific work and reports etc.
I read a most interesting biography of him a while back and it was one of those books where it is such a pity to come to the end.
If there was such a thing as an after-life, I'd seek him out and tell him how much I admire his life and work!
The Most Honourable Sister of Titular Indecision.

Anchorman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16038
  • Maranatha!
Re: Finalists for the £50 note portrait must be scientists
« Reply #24 on: November 03, 2018, 02:38:13 PM »
Isaac Newton was on the last £1 note.

I thought about Rosalind Franklin, but if her, why not Francis Crick?
       


Fleming was a (very) distant rellie of mine. Howver, he may have isolated peniccilin; he did not discover it.
"for, as long as but a hundred of us remain alive, never will we on any conditions be brought under English rule. It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself."