E-mail address to contact Admin direct is admin@religionethics followed by .co.uk.
[quote author=Genial Harry Grout link=topic=16437.msg761107#msg761107 date=1547639553]No. See my earlier comment. This thread has descended into a debate about the correct use of words.One of the reasons I post so rarely on this Forum these days is NS's pedantry, he takes nit-picking to a degree that is beyond the ken of most normal folk, and YES YES YES it frequently does come down to I AM RIGHT AND YOU ARE WRONG AND IT WILL ALWAYS BE THUS and he can deny it all he likes but that will not change my view on the subject, hence my lack of posts.
Quote from: Genial Harry Grout on January 16, 2019, 11:52:33 AMNo. See my earlier comment. This thread has descended into a debate about the correct use of words.One of the reasons I post so rarely on this Forum these days is NR's pedantry, he takes nit-picking to a degree that is beyond the ken of most normal folk, and YES YES YES it frequently does come down to I AM RIGHT AND YOU ARE WRONG AND IT WILL ALWAYS BE THUS and he can deny it all he likes but that will not change my view on the subject, hence my lack of posts.
No. See my earlier comment. This thread has descended into a debate about the correct use of words.
He's not the only one Owl!
It seems that way because he is on here every day, more than the others. Are your ears burning NS? No 'fence.
If someone says there is no god, then they are an atheist, but they then have the burden of proof.I do not believe the is a god, and I do not believe there is not god
As Vlad has just run away from the explanation for why atheism isn't just a personal truth (because the logic attempted for theism is objectively falsifiable) as fast as his little legs could carry him I think we're done here are we not? What those individual arguments happen to be is of course a different matter entirely.
So is atheism a question of avoiding saying there is no God.........Or is it the belief there is no god rather than the knowledge that there is no god?And if it is merely the belief there is no god......thensurely atheism is just another true for me position.
Or none of the above.
What is your definition of atheism then? Belief in or knowledge of?
Simply an absence of beliefs about claims of supernatural agency.No you believe they are not true. Otherwise you would believe they at least might be true.So no absence of belief about god here.
No you believe they are not true. Otherwise you would believe they at least might be true.So no absence of belief about god here.
Wrong: I don't 'believe they are not true' in that I find nothing in claims of 'God' that gets me that far: all I see is an incoherent mess that is, as they say, no more than meaningless white noise.
The definition of atheism is, "disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of god or gods."
I have asked many times, 'if god/gods exists, why do they hide away?'
Gods plural is a ridiculous notion as far as i'm concernedI dont find God hidden but then I dont expect to see God with my eyes.and thats all I want to say rather than get diverted from the logical nonsense of evasive atheism.
Humans worship many different gods, so they are in the plural. How can you know for a fact your version of a god exists, when you can't see, feel or hear it, so therefore it is hidden. My dear it is you who is spouting evasive nonsense.
Wrong.This thread is about whether Atheism is a true for the individual thing or true for everyone.There are numerous threads covering what you want to talk about which is not wether atheism is objectively true, proven or even logical.
Unless it can be proved that god/gods exist, it is reasonable to be a non believer. The existence of the Biblical god is as credible as the existence of leprechauns (Happy St Patrick's Day).
If you say you dont believe they are not true then you either believe they are true or they might be true..........unless of course you are posting while holding on to your lucky rabbits foot.
You're not reading for comprehension: I didn't imply that I 'don't believe they are not true', 'are true' or 'might be true' - I said I have no beliefs about 'God(s)' because I think the notion of 'God(s)' is an incoherent mess that is inherently meaningless despite the enthusiasm of such as yourself.
The statements"I have no beliefs about God" and"I think the notion of godsis an incoherent mess etc" are not compatable and contradict each other.