Sriram,
Your thinking is too microscopic, which is why you need metrics for everything. I can see the effects of religion all around me.
No it isn’t. If you want to make a claim of fact – ”X was more successful than no X would have been” – then you need some way to measure the effects of X and no X. If not for measurable metrics, then what?
I can see the effects of religion all around me.
Anecdote isn’t evidence. Surely you realise that by now don’t you?
Newton probably realized that even the discovery of gravity was not enough to explain life and to make it worthwhile. He was probably looking for the subtle forces behind the obvious natural laws. Sensible IMO!
Whatever you’re guessing he was looking for and however sensible you think that to have been, it misses the point: had Newton kept at his (real world) research it’s quite possible that he would have made discoveries long before they were eventually made by others, with an accelerating effect on progress.
Knowledge is not just about the material world around us. Diminishing returns!
So you assert. Presumably then you’ll be along at some point to demonstrate a non-material about which we could also have knowledge?
Many many youngsters, engineers, doctors, science students, are today taking up spiritual practices because they find them more fulfilling.
So you claim. And how do you think discoveries in engineering, medicine and science do could thereby be produced even if it was true?